Key result
A combined noncontrast MRA protocol using SN3D and QISS for TAVR planning was technically feasible, showing good measurement agreement and similar image quality compared to CTA.
Why the study?
Is a noncontrast MRA protocol combining SN3D and QISS technically feasible and comparable to CTA for preoperative TAVR evaluation?
Observational (n=15)
Is a noncontrast MRA protocol combining SN3D and QISS technically feasible and comparable to CTA for preoperative TAVR evaluation?
A combined noncontrast MRA protocol using SN3D and QISS is technically feasible and provides comparable measurements to CTA for TAVR planning, offering a potential alternative for patients who cannot receive contrast.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for noncontrast MRA in TAVR planning; larger validation studies required before clinical consideration.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the technical feasibility of a noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) protocol using investigational prototype self-navigated 3D (SN3D) radial whole-heart and quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) pulse sequences regarding their potential in planning transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five patients (76±7 y) with severe aortic valve stenosis and prior computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for TAVR planning and 10 healthy volunteers (28±6 y) underwent noncontrast MRA on a 1.5 T system. A SN3D whole-heart acquisition was used to assess the aortic root anatomy. Evaluation of the aortoiliac access route was performed with both SN3D and QISS. Measurements were compared among SN3D, QISS, and CTA using a paired t test or 1-way analysis of variance. Image quality ratings and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using Cohen's κ. RESULTS: The combined SN3D and QISS protocol provided a 10.1±1.6-minute acquisition time. TAVR-relevant evaluation was technically feasible in healthy volunteers. All measurements showed good agreement with CTA in patients (all P>0.098). SN3D and QISS produced similar image quality both in volunteers and in patients (all P>0.122). There was no difference in qualitative ratings between MRA and CTA (all P>0.119). Interobserver agreement was good for MRA (κ=0.71 to 0.76) and excellent for CTA (κ=0.82 to 0.84). Thoracic SN3D provided a similar CNR compared with CTA (P=0.117). CTA yielded higher CNR in the abdominopelvic region compared with QISS (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: A noncontrast MRA protocol combining SN3D and QISS acquisitions for the assessment of cardiac and vascular access route anatomy has technical feasibility for TAVR planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cannaò et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Severe aortic valve stenosis (n=15). Combined noncontrast MRA protocol (SN3D and QISS) vs. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was evaluated on Technical feasibility, measurement agreement, and image quality compared to CTA. A combined noncontrast MRA protocol using SN3D and QISS for TAVR planning was technically feasible, showing good measurement agreement and similar image quality compared to CTA.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: