Key result
Higher heart rates degrade image quality in non-contrast 5T one-stop MRA.
Why the study?
The feasibility of a non-contrast 5T one-stop MRA protocol for simultaneous assessment of the thoracic aorta and coronary arteries and the effect of heart rate on image quality were not established.
Is a non-contrast 5T one-stop MRA protocol feasible for simultaneous assessment of the thoracic aorta and coronary arteries in healthy volunteers, and how does heart rate affect image quality?
Observational (n=34)
Is a non-contrast 5T one-stop MRA protocol feasible for simultaneous assessment of the thoracic aorta and coronary arteries in healthy volunteers, and how does heart rate affect image quality?
A 5T non-contrast one-stop MRA protocol is technically feasible for simultaneous assessment of the thoracic aorta and coronary arteries in healthy volunteers, though higher heart rates reduce coronary image quality.
Non-contrast 5T one-stop MRA appears feasible in volunteers; leaves open clinical adoption and HR impact in patients pending larger studies.
Background/Objectives: This prospective study evaluated the feasibility of a non-contrast 5T one-stop MRA protocol for simultaneous assessment of the thoracic aorta and coronary arteries and examined the effect of heart rate (HR) on image quality. Methods: Thirty-four healthy volunteers underwent 5T MRA and were stratified by median HR into Low-HR (≤70 bpm, n = 17) and High-HR (>70 bpm, n = 17) groups. Subjective image quality was assessed using a 4-point scale, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and vessel edge sharpness (VES) were measured in predefined aortic and proximal coronary segments. Results: The protocol was successfully completed in all participants, and all evaluated segments were evaluable. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement was excellent (kappa ≥ 0.90; ICC ≥ 0.85). Subjective aortic scores did not differ between HR groups, whereas several coronary segments had lower scores in the High-HR group. SNR, CNR, and VES were higher in the Low-HR group across all objectively assessed segments. Conclusions: These findings support the technical feasibility of integrated 5T non-contrast MRA in healthy volunteers and suggest that the subjective effect of higher HR is more evident in the coronary arteries than in the thoracic aorta, warranting further validation in patients with cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
(14594) et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy volunteers (n=34). 5T non-contrast one-stop MRA was evaluated on Feasibility, subjective image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and vessel edge sharpness (VES). A 5T non-contrast one-stop MRA protocol was successfully completed in all 34 healthy volunteers, with higher heart rates (>70 bpm) reducing objective image quality metrics across all segments.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: