Key result
Programmed electrical stimulation remains an important tool for inducing cardiac arrhythmias, though its accuracy in predicting antiarrhythmic drug efficacy remains controversial.
Why the study?
Does programmed electrical stimulation accurately predict the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for the prevention of ventricular arrhythmias?
Does programmed electrical stimulation accurately predict the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for the prevention of ventricular arrhythmias?
This review highlights ongoing controversies regarding the accuracy of programmed electrical stimulation in predicting the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for ventricular arrhythmias.
May improve patient selection for arrhythmia studies; leaves open accuracy of serial drug testing for efficacy.
After more than 20 years of clinical use, programmed electrical stimulation for induction of cardiac arrhythmias remains an important clinical and research tool. The procedure continues to undergo refinement but is not without controversy regarding its accuracy in predicting drug efficacy as determined by serial testing for suppression of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Recent work has streamlined technical aspects of the procedure itself and promises to improve the selection of patients likely to benefit from such studies. Despite these advances, however, recent publications from the Electrophysiologic Study Versus Electrocardiographic Monitoring trial raise fundamental questions about the ability of any current strategy to predict the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs for the prevention of ventricular arrhythmias.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wood et al. (1994) conducted a review in Sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Programmed electrical stimulation was evaluated. Programmed electrical stimulation remains an important tool for inducing cardiac arrhythmias, though its accuracy in predicting antiarrhythmic drug efficacy remains controversial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: