Key result
Visceral adiposity index was strongly associated with a metabolically unhealthy phenotype in normal-weight boys (OR 6.15) and performed better than traditional adiposity indicators.
Why the study?
The relationship between the visceral adiposity index (VAI) and unhealthy metabolic phenotype remained unclear in children and adolescents.
Does the visceral adiposity index better predict metabolically unhealthy phenotypes compared to traditional adiposity indicators in children and adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,722)
Yes
Does the visceral adiposity index better predict metabolically unhealthy phenotypes compared to traditional adiposity indicators in children and adolescents?
Odds Ratio: 6.15 (95% CI 4.13–9.14)
p-value: p=<0.001
The visceral adiposity index (VAI) is a superior surrogate marker compared to traditional adiposity indicators for identifying metabolically unhealthy phenotypes in Chinese children and adolescents.
VAI strongly associated with metabolically unhealthy phenotype; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
The relationship between visceral adiposity index (VAI) and unhealthy metabolic phenotype remained unclear in children and adolescents. This study aimed to investigate their association and compared the ability of VAI and traditional adiposity indicators (body mass index, waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio) to predict metabolically unhealthy phenotype among normal-weight, overweight and obese children and adolescents. In this cross-sectional study, 1722 children and adolescents aged 12-18 years were selected by cluster random sampling, underwent a questionnaire survey, physical examination and biochemical tests. Participants were divided into four phenotypes according to the combination of the weight status determined by body mass index (BMI) and metabolic syndrome components. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and multivariate logistic regression were used to compare the predictive capacity between VAI and traditional adiposity indicators and their relationship with metabolically unhealthy phenotype. We found that VAI had better performance in predicting metabolically unhealthy phenotype than traditional adiposity indicators, the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.808 and 0.763 for boys and girls with normal-weight, 0.829 and 0.816 for boys and girls with overweight and obese (all P < 0.001). VAI was most strongly related to metabolically unhealthy phenotype whether or not to adjust the age, the adjusted OR and 95%CI was 6.15 (4.13-9.14) in boys with normal weight, and 5.90 (3.06-11.36), 4.95 (2.35-10.41) in boys and girls with overweight and obese, respectively (all P < 0.001). Our findings suggested VAI could be used as a comprehensive predictor to identify unhealthy metabolic phenotype in children and adolescents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Metabolically unhealthy phenotype (n=1,722). Visceral adiposity index (VAI) vs. Traditional adiposity indicators (BMI, waist circumference, waist-to-height ratio) was evaluated on Metabolically unhealthy normal-weight (MUNW) phenotype in boys (OR 6.15, 95% CI 4.13-9.14, p=<0.001). Visceral adiposity index was strongly associated with a metabolically unhealthy phenotype in normal-weight boys (OR 6.15) and performed better than traditional adiposity indicators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: