Key result
V-LAP monitoring proves safe in heart failure with 97% freedom from MACNE and good PCWP correlation.
Why the study?
Direct left-sided hemodynamic sensors offer theoretical benefits beyond pulmonary artery pressure monitoring systems, but the safety, usability, and performance of a novel left atrial pressure monitoring system in HF patients needed evaluation.
Is the V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system safe and accurate in patients with heart failure?
Population
30 patients with HF
Comparison
V-LAP interatrial leadless sensor monitoring system implantation
Design
First-in-human prospective multicenter single-arm clinical trial
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“The V-LAP monitoring system proved to be generally safe and provided a good correlation with invasive PCWP. Initial evidence also suggests possible improvement in HF clinical symptoms that could be associated to a better outcome. Further studies are needed to test the efficacy of the device in heart failure patients.”
Supports feasibility of remote PCWP monitoring in HF; leaves open impact on outcomes pending randomized trials.
Is the V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system safe and accurate in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: LCCC 0.776 (95% CI 0.582-0.886)
p-value: p=<0.0001
The V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system is safe, accurately correlates with invasive PCWP, and its use to guide management is associated with improved clinical symptoms in heart failure patients.
D’Amario et al. (2023) studied heart failure (n=30). V-LAP monitoring system was evaluated on Safety (freedom from short-term MACNE) and performance (agreement between sensor-calculated LAP and PCWP) at 3 months (LCCC 0.776, 95% CI 0.582-0.886, p=<0.0001). The V-LAP monitoring system was safe in heart failure patients, with 97% freedom from short-term MACNE at 3 months and good correlation with invasive PCWP (LCCC 0.776; 95% CI 0.582-0.886; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: