Key result
The V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system was safely implanted in 30 heart failure patients and correlated well with PCWP.
Why the study?
Direct left-sided haemodynamic sensors offer theoretical benefits beyond pulmonary artery pressure monitoring systems, but the safety, usability, and performance of a novel left atrial pressure monitoring system needed evaluation.
Is the V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system safe and accurate in patients with heart failure?
Is the V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system safe and accurate in patients with heart failure?
The V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system is safe to implant and provides accurate pressure measurements compared to invasive PCWP, with preliminary evidence of clinical symptom improvement in heart failure patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LAP monitoring appears feasible in HF; hypothesis-generating for clinical benefit, randomized trials needed before practice change.
AIMS: In heart failure (HF), implantable haemodynamic monitoring devices have been shown to optimize therapy, anticipating clinical decompensation and preventing hospitalization. Direct left-sided haemodynamic sensors offer theoretical benefits beyond pulmonary artery pressure monitoring systems. We evaluated the safety, usability, and performance of a novel left atrial pressure (LAP) monitoring system in HF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The VECTOR-HF study (NCT03775161) was a first-in-human, prospective, multicentre, single-arm, clinical trial enrolling 30 patients with HF. The device consisted of an interatrial positioned leadless sensor, able to transmit LAP data wirelessly. After 3 months, a right heart catheterization was performed to correlate mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) with simultaneous mean LAP obtained from the device. Remote LAP measurements were then used to guide patient management. The miniaturized device was successfully implanted in all 30 patients, without acute major adverse cardiac and neurological events (MACNE). At 3 months, freedom from short-term MACNE was 97%. Agreement between sensor-calculated LAP and PCWP was consistent, with a mean difference of -0.22 ± 4.92 mmHg, the correlation coefficient and the Lin's concordance correlation coefficient values were equal to 0.79 (p < 0.0001) and 0.776 (95% confidence interval 0.582-0.886), respectively. Preliminary experience with V-LAP-based HF management was associated with significant improvements in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class (32% of patients reached NYHA class II at 6 months, p < 0.005; 60% of patients at 12 months, p < 0.005) and 6-min walk test distance (from 244.59 ± 119.59 m at baseline to 311.78 ± 129.88 m after 6 months, p < 0.05, and 343.95 ± 146.15 m after 12 months, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The V-LAP™ monitoring system proved to be generally safe and provided a good correlation with invasive PCWP. Initial evidence also suggests possible improvement in HF clinical symptoms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Amario et al. (2023) studied Heart failure (n=30). V-LAP monitoring system was evaluated on Agreement between sensor-calculated LAP and PCWP at 3 months (Lin's concordance correlation coefficient 0.776, 95% CI 0.582-0.886, p=<0.0001). The V-LAP wireless left atrial pressure monitoring system was safely implanted in 30 heart failure patients and correlated well with PCWP.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: