Key result
This review provides a comprehensive overview of techniques for mitigating common-mode interference in biopotential analog front-ends to guide future designers.
Why the study?
Practical design guidance was needed for mitigating common-mode interference in biopotential analog front-ends across diverse recording setups.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This review provides practical design insights for mitigating common-mode interference in biopotential analog front-ends, which is relevant for devices like ECGs.
This review provides a comprehensive overview of techniques for mitigating common-mode interference (CMI) in biopotential analog front-ends (AFEs). The mechanisms of CMI generation in various biopotential measurement scenarios, including neurostimulation and two-electrode ECG, are modeled electrically. The impact of CMI on signal quality is analyzed from both small-signal and large-signal views, highlighting the scenario-dependent nature of the CMI issue. Techniques for improving the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) are introduced to suppress CMI in small-signal conditions. The concept of total CMRR (TCMRR), which incorporates the effect of asymmetric contact impedance, is reviewed, and corresponding design strategies for maximizing TCMRR are analyzed. In the large-signal view, CMI-induced distortion and approaches for enhancing tolerance CMI are discussed, addressing both sub-supply and over-supply CMI scenarios. By analyzing mitigation techniques across different measurement contexts, this review offers practical design insights to guide future biopotential AFE designers in selecting the most appropriate solutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hyoung et al. (2025) reported a review. This review provides a comprehensive overview of techniques for mitigating common-mode interference in biopotential analog front-ends to guide future designers.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: