Key result
CMR yields ~54% additional structural abnormality detection in ventricular arrhythmias with normal echocardiography.
Why the study?
Routine diagnostic work-up fails to identify structural abnormalities in many patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, prompting evaluation of the added diagnostic value of CMR.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provide additional diagnostic yield in patients with frequent idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias and normal echocardiography?
Observational (n=144)
Single-blind
No
Does cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging provide additional diagnostic yield in patients with frequent idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias and normal echocardiography?
CMR provides significant additional diagnostic yield in over half of patients with frequent idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias and normal echocardiograms, primarily identifying previous myocarditis.
May support selective CMR use when echo is normal; hypothesis-generating for outcome impact in idiopathic VAs.
Background: A routine diagnostic work-up does not identify structural abnormalities in a substantial proportion of patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We investigated the added value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in this group of patients. Methods: A single-centre prospective study was undertaken of 72 patients (mean age 46 ± 16 years; 53% females) with frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs ≥ 500/24 h) and/or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), an otherwise normal electrocardiogram, normal echocardiography and no coronary artery disease. Results: CMR provided an additional diagnostic yield in 54.2% of patients. The most prevalent diagnosis was previous myocarditis (23.6%) followed by possible PVC-related cardiomyopathy (20.8%), non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (8.3%) and ischaemic heart disease (1.4%). The predictors of abnormal CMR findings were male gender, age and PVCs/NSVT non-outflow tract-related or with multiple morphologies. Patients with VAs had an impaired peak left ventricular (LV) global radial strain (GRS) compared with the controls (28.88% (IQR: 25.87% to 33.97%) vs. 36.65% (IQR: 33.19% to 40.2%), p < 0.001) and a global circumferential strain (GCS) (−17.66% (IQR: −19.62% to −16.23%) vs. −20.66% (IQR: −21.72% to −19.6%), p < 0.001). Conclusion: CMR reveals abnormalities in a significant proportion of patients with frequent idiopathic VAs. Male gender, age and non-outflow tract PVC origin can be clinical indicators for CMR referral.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolaidou et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Frequent idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (n=144). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging vs. Healthy controls / Normal echocardiography was evaluated on Detection of underlying structural heart disease (additional diagnostic yield). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging identified underlying structural abnormalities, yielding an additional diagnostic value of 54.2% in patients with frequent idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias who had normal findings on routine echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: