Key result
Apixaban exposure was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent VTE hospitalization compared to rivaroxaban (HR 0.65) and warfarin (HR 0.68) during secondary prevention.
Why the study?
Many patients with VTE benefit from anticoagulation beyond 3 to 6 months, but it was unclear whether warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban is associated with reduced recurrent VTE hospitalization during secondary prevention.
Does apixaban or rivaroxaban compared to warfarin or each other reduce recurrent VTE hospitalization in patients requiring secondary prevention of VTE?
Cohort (n=25,419)
Does apixaban or rivaroxaban compared to warfarin or each other reduce recurrent VTE hospitalization in patients requiring secondary prevention of VTE?
Hazard Ratio: 0.65 (95% CI 0.45–0.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.1% vs 1.9%
In the secondary prevention of VTE, apixaban is associated with a lower rate of recurrent VTE hospitalization compared to rivaroxaban and warfarin.
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) affects nearly 1 million Americans annually, and many benefit from continued anticoagulation after the initial 3- to 6-month treatment period (secondary prevention). Objectives To determine whether warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban is associated with reduced recurrent VTE hospitalization in the secondary prevention of VTE. Patients/Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of participants enrolled in the MarketScan Insurance Database between 2013 and 2017 in those with an incident VTE. In those individuals who continued oral anticoagulation (warfarin, apixaban, or rivaroxaban) beyond 6 months, we determined the relative rate of recurrent VTE hospitalization. Results Among 119 964 individuals with VTE, 25 419 remained on anticoagulation after 6 months and were matched successfully by age, sex, and date. After adjusting for a propensity score, apixaban versus rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.94) and apixaban versus warfarin (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-1.00) had a reduced risk of recurrent VTE hospitalization, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.94-1.33) had equivalent rates. For the rivaroxaban versus warfarin comparison there was a significant interaction by renal function (P < .01) where rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of recurrent VTE hospitalization (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41-1.03) in those with kidney disease and increased risk in those without kidney disease (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.02-1.50). Conclusions These data suggest that apixaban has a lower recurrent VTE hospitalization rate than rivaroxaban during the secondary prevention of VTE, and further study of diverse patient populations, especially by kidney function, is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zakai et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism (secondary prevention) (n=25,419). Apixaban vs. Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Recurrent VTE hospitalization (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94). Apixaban exposure was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent VTE hospitalization compared to rivaroxaban (HR 0.65) and warfarin (HR 0.68) during secondary prevention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: