Key result
Apixaban and rivaroxaban show no difference in nonvertebral fracture risk versus warfarin in VTE.
Why the study?
Studies in atrial fibrillation raised concerns that warfarin may carry a higher fracture risk than direct oral anticoagulants, but comparative data in venous thromboembolism were needed.
Does apixaban or rivaroxaban reduce nonvertebral fractures compared to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Cohort (n=125,389)
Does apixaban or rivaroxaban reduce nonvertebral fractures compared to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism?
Hazard Ratio: 1.12 (95% CI 0.89–1.41)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.9% vs 9.9%
Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin present comparable risks for nonvertebral fractures when used for venous thromboembolism secondary prevention, providing reassurance regarding the bone safety of direct oral anticoagulants.
Similar fracture risks with apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin; extends AF data to VTE but should not yet change practice.
Oral anticoagulants are widely used to prevent recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), but studies of these drugs in patients with atrial fibrillation have raised concerns that warfarin may be associated with higher risk of fractures than direct oral anticoagulants. Using the United States administrative claims data from Medicare and Optum Clinformatics (January 2016 to June 2024), we conducted a cohort study that emulated a three-arm target trial of VTE patients who initiated apixaban (N = 73 668), rivaroxaban (N = 30 849), or warfarin (N = 20 872). The primary outcome was nonvertebral fractures. Propensity score matching weights were used to balance baseline covariates. Patients were followed while on treatment; intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses were also conducted. Weighted hazard ratios while on treatment were 1.12 (95% CI, 0.89-1.41) for apixaban vs. warfarin, 1.13 (95% CI, 0.87-1.46) for rivaroxaban vs. warfarin, and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.80-1.23) for apixaban vs rivaroxaban. Results were consistent for ITT and other sensitivity analyses and across subgroups of age, sex, osteoporosis, and chronic kidney disease. Our findings suggest that apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin are comparable with regards to nonvertebral fracture risk when used for VTE secondary prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bea et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism (n=125,389). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Nonvertebral fractures (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.89-1.41). Apixaban and rivaroxaban showed no significant difference in the risk of nonvertebral fractures compared to warfarin in patients with venous thromboembolism (HR 1.12 and 1.13, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: