Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The weakness of the present method of fatigue limit assessment is discussed and a new approach to fatigue limit assessment using a three-parameter log-log and Weibull plot is proposed. With this new approach to the analysis of alternating fatigue test data, it is confirmed that hearing steel does not show any fatigue limit, whereas structural steel does have a distinct fatigue limit. In absence of a fatigue limit for hearing steel, a minimum life or a minimum number of stress cycles prior to failure is proposed for the analysis of fatigue life behavior under a given rolling contact fatigue load or stress, leading to a three-parameter Weibull life distribution function. The experimental data is found to fit very well to this distribution. A comparison of the stress-life exponents estimated for the structural steel and bearing steel using three methods of analysis shows the values to be very close indicating similarity in their fatigue behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shigeo SHIMIZU (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: