Bleeding risk assessment tools and management strategies, including radial access and tailored antithrombotic therapy, are essential for optimizing outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
This review summarizes current evidence and practical strategies for assessing and mitigating bleeding risk in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bleeding is one of the most common and feared complications after coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is associated with longer hospital stays, higher mortality, and worse clinical outcomes. As the number of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) continues to grow, preventing bleeding has become an important part of PCI management. This practical review summarizes current evidence on how to assess bleeding risk and reduce bleeding before, during, and after PCI. Several tools, including the BARC classification, ARC-HBR criteria, PRECISE-DAPT, and DAPT scores, help identify patients who may benefit from tailored treatment. Current strategies include the use of radial access, optimized anticoagulation, appropriate selection of antiplatelet therapy, newer-generation drug-eluting stents, and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in selected HBR patients. We also discuss the management of patients with atrial fibrillation requiring oral anticoagulation, as well as those with anemia or thrombocytopenia. Although significant progress has been made, several questions remain unanswered, particularly regarding transfusion thresholds, antithrombotic therapy in complex patients, and the best balance between bleeding and ischemic risks. Ongoing clinical trials are expected to provide further evidence and help improve the management of patients undergoing PCI.
Salihu et al. (Wed,) conducted a review in Percutaneous coronary intervention. Bleeding risk assessment and management was evaluated. Bleeding risk assessment tools and management strategies, including radial access and tailored antithrombotic therapy, are essential for optimizing outcomes in patients undergoing PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: