Key result
Shortened DAPT and polymer-free DES maintain ischemic protection while minimizing bleeding in HBR patients.
Why the study?
In patients at high bleeding risk undergoing PCI, standard antithrombotic regimens may cause major bleeding complications, requiring strategies to balance ischemic protection and bleeding safety.
Population
Patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports tailored antithrombotic strategies in HBR PCI patients; leaves open prospective validation of ultra-short DAPT and novel agents.
This review provides a comprehensive framework for managing high bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI, emphasizing personalized antithrombotic strategies and novel stent technologies to balance ischemic and bleeding risks.
Xu et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR). Optimized PCI strategies (shortened DAPT, polymer-free DES, de-escalation) vs. Standard antithrombotic regimens and bare-metal stents was evaluated. Modern percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, including shortened dual antiplatelet therapy and polymer-free drug-eluting stents, provide effective ischemic protection while minimizing bleeding risk in high bleeding risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: