Key result
Contemporary strategies fail to reduce disproportionate mortality in HBR patients, demanding precision medicine and safer antithrombotics.
Why the study?
Despite contemporary strategies reducing bleeding risk, HBR patients continue to experience disproportionate mortality.
This review highlights contemporary strategies for managing high bleeding risk patients undergoing PCI, emphasizing the need for precision medicine and standardized frameworks to further reduce mortality.
INTRODUCTION: High bleeding risk (HBR) affects over one-third of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with elevated mortality due to both hemorrhagic and ischemic complications. Optimizing the management of these patients remains a critical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes advances in bleeding risk assessment and management strategies in HBR patients. Literature was evaluated regarding validated risk tools (ARC-HBR, PRECISE-HBR), procedural approaches (radial access, intravascular imaging-guided PCI), device selection (contemporary drug-eluting and polymer-free stents, drug-eluting balloons), and pharmacologic optimization (shortened dual antiplatelet therapy, minimization of triple therapy, proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis). Emerging approaches, including artificial intelligence-enhanced risk prediction, biomarker-based phenotyping, and pharmacogenomic-guided antiplatelet selection, are also discussed. Dedicated HBR care pathways and multidisciplinary programs supporting best-practice implementation are highlighted. EXPERT OPINION: Despite contemporary strategies reducing bleeding risk, HBR patients continue to experience disproportionate mortality. Precision medicine approaches, including continuous risk quantification, next-generation antithrombotics with improved safety, and standardized, data-driven HBR management frameworks, are needed to further optimize outcomes and guide future trials in this high-risk population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ANDO et al. (2026) conducted a review in High bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Contemporary management strategies was evaluated. Despite contemporary management strategies reducing bleeding risk, high bleeding risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention continue to experience disproportionate mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: