Key result
A patient-tailored approach utilizing both conduction system pacing and targeted biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy may optimize lead placement in dyssynchronous heart failure.
Why the study?
Response to CRT remains variable in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure, and standard transvenous left ventricular lead placement has remained largely unchanged for more than two decades.
A patient-tailored approach utilizing both conduction system pacing and targeted biventricular CRT may optimize outcomes in dyssynchronous heart failure.
May support tailored CRT strategies in HF; leaves open optimal pacing approaches for broad populations.
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) greatly reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. However, despite tremendous efforts, response has been variable and can be further improved. Although optimizing left ventricular lead placement (LVLP) is arguably the cornerstone of CRT, the procedure of LVLP using the transvenous approach has remained largely unchanged for more than 2 decades. Improvements have been developed using scar location and electrical and/or mechanical mapping, and interest in conduction system pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing has emerged recently. Conduction system pacing is promising but may not be suitable for all patients with dyssynchronous heart failure. This review underscores the importance of a patient-tailored approach and discusses the potential applications of both conduction system pacing and targeted biventricular CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wouters et al. (2021) conducted a review in Dyssynchronous heart failure. Optimizing left ventricular lead placement and conduction system pacing was evaluated. A patient-tailored approach utilizing both conduction system pacing and targeted biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy may optimize lead placement in dyssynchronous heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: