Key result
Advance care planning group visits for older adults with heart failure significantly improved patient readiness scores pre-to-post (+0.53; p=0.002), but this was not sustained at 1 month.
Why the study?
Advance care planning is critical for heart failure patients despite important challenges, and group visits may engage patients and caregivers in identifying values and care preferences.
Does a single advance care planning group visit improve ACP readiness and self-efficacy in older adults with heart failure?
Does a single advance care planning group visit improve ACP readiness and self-efficacy in older adults with heart failure?
Effect estimate: +0.53
p-value: p=0.002
A single 90-minute ACP group visit for older heart failure patients improves short-term ACP readiness, but the effect is not sustained at 1 month, highlighting the need for ongoing follow-up conversations.
ACP group visits yield transient readiness gains in older HF adults; leaves open durability and scalability for larger trials.
OBJECTIVE: Advance care planning (ACP) is critically important for heart failure patients, yet important challenges exist. Group visits can be a helpful way to engage patients and caregivers in identifying values and preferences for future care in a resource-efficient way. We sought to evaluate the impact of group visits for ACP among older adults with heart failure and their caregivers on ACP-related outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods pilot study evaluating the impact of an ACP group visit for older adults with heart failure and their caregivers on ACP-related outcomes including readiness and self-efficacy. The evidence-based PREPARE for Your Care video-based intervention was used to guide the group visits. Twenty patients and 10 caregivers attended one of the five 90-min group visits led by a trained facilitator. Group visit participants completed pre-, post-, and 1-month follow-up surveys using validated 5-point ACP readiness and self-efficacy scales. Qualitative feedback obtained within 3 days of a group visit was analyzed using a directed content analysis. RESULTS: Patient participants had a median age of 78 years. Approximately half were female while caregiver participants were mostly female. Participants were predominantly white. Patient readiness scores improved significantly pre-to-post (+0.53; p = 0.002) but was not sustained at 1-month follow-up. Patient and caregiver self-efficacy showed some improvement pre-to-post but was also not sustained at follow-up. Interviews revealed positive impacts of group visits across the three themes: encouraging reviewing or revisiting prior ACP activities, motivating patients to take direct steps towards ACP, and serving as a "wake-up" call to action. CONCLUSIONS: Disease-focused group visits may have a short-term effect on ACP outcomes but ongoing touchpoints are likely necessary to sustain ACP over time. The results highlight a need for follow-up ACP conversations after a single group visit. Timing for follow-ups and the ideal person to follow-up ACP conversations needs to be explored.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahluwalia et al. (2021) studied Heart failure (n=30). Advance care planning group visits was evaluated on Patient readiness scores (+0.53, p=0.002). Advance care planning group visits for older adults with heart failure significantly improved patient readiness scores pre-to-post (+0.53; p=0.002), but this was not sustained at 1 month.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: