Key result
Increased shock index was significantly associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.93) in patients with acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Heart failure remains associated with considerable mortality rates, making the use of simple prognostic tools pivotal.
Do shock index (SI) and its derivatives predict mortality in patients with acute heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=12,955)
Do shock index (SI) and its derivatives predict mortality in patients with acute heart failure?
Odds Ratio: 1.93 (95% CI 1.3–2.85)
p-value: p=0.001
Shock index and its derivatives (ASI, MSI) are practical, easily available tools that can predict in-hospital mortality and help prioritize high-risk patients with acute heart failure.
SI may aid early risk stratification in acute HF; leaves open its added value beyond standard scores in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is still associated with quite considerable mortality rates and usage of simple tools for prognosis is pivotal. We aimed to evaluate the effect of shock index (SI) and its derivatives (age SI (ASI), modified SI (MSI), and age MSI (AMSI)) on acute HF (AHF) clinical outcomes. METHODS: PubMed/Medline, Scopus and Web of science databases were screened with no time and language limitations till February 2024. We recruited relevant records assessed SI, ASI, MSI or AMSI with AHF clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Eight records were selected (age: 69.44±15.05 years). Mean SI in those records reported mortality (either in-hospital or long-term death) was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.63-0.72)). In-hospital and follow-up mortality rates in seven(n = 12955) and three(n = 5253) enrolled records were 6.18% and 10.14% with mean SI of 0.68(95%CI:0.63-0.73) and 0.72(95%CI:0.62-0.81), respectively. Deceased versus survived patients had higher SI difference (0.30, 95%CI:0.06-0.53, P = 0.012). Increased SI was associated with higher chances of in-hospital death (odds ratio (OR): 1.93, 95%CI:1.30-2.85, P = 0.001).The optimal SI cut-off point was found to be 0.79 (sensitivity: 57.6%, specificity: 62.1%). In-hospital mortality based on ASI was 6.12% (mean ASI: 47.49, 95%CI: 44.73-50.25) and significant difference was found between death and alive subgroups (0.48, 95%CI:0.39-0.57, P<0.001). Also, ASI was found to be independent in-hospital mortality predictor (OR: 2.54, 95%CI:2.04-3.16, P<0.001)). The optimal ASI cut-off point was found to be 49.6 (sensitivity: 66.3%, specificity: 58.6%). In terms of MSI (mean: 0.93, 95%CI:0.88-0.98)), significant difference was found specified by death/survival status (0.34, 95%CI:0.05-0.63, P = 0.021). AMSI data synthesis was not possible due to presence of a single record. CONCLUSIONS: SI, ASI, and MSI are practical available tools for AHF prognosis assessment in clinical settings to prioritize high risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vakhshoori et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute heart failure (n=12,955). Shock index (SI) vs. Lower shock index was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.30-2.85, p=0.001). Increased shock index was significantly associated with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 1.93) in patients with acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: