Key result
The presence of more than two antibiotic prophylaxis errors was significantly associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (OR 4.030; 95% CI 1.018 to 15.96).
Why the study?
Does nonconcordance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines increase the risk of surgical site infections in elective surgical procedures?
Observational (n=216)
Does nonconcordance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines increase the risk of surgical site infections in elective surgical procedures?
Odds Ratio: 4.03 (95% CI 1.018–15.96)
p-value: p=0.001
A strong correlation exists between the degree of concordance to SSI prevention guidelines and the rate of surgical site infections, with multiple prophylaxis errors significantly increasing risk.
Observational data on SSI predictors and guideline concordance should not yet change practice; leaves open the relative importance of individual measures.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common and preventable complication of surgery, but the relative importance of individual measures recommended by guidelines has not been determined. Elective general surgical, neurological, and orthopedic procedures requiring antibiotic prophylaxis from a 3-month period were retrospectively studied to determine concordance with SSI prevention guidelines and to identify factors which predicted the development of SSIs. A total of 216 surgeries were reviewed, with 18 SSIs (8.3%). A mean of 1.4 antibiotic prophylaxis errors per surgery were identified, with correct antibiotic type identified for 64%, antibiotic timing for 83%, supplemental antibiotic dosing for 34%, and antibiotic duration of less than 24 h for 44%. Normothermia was present in 79% of surgeries, and normoglycemia was present in 17%. Univariate analysis of the SSI rate identified four significant factors. Antibiotic prophylaxis for less than 24 h postoperatively (odds ratio [OR], 0.213; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]0.060 to 0.757) and neurosurgery (OR, 0.118; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.903) correlated with a reduced risk of SSI. The mean number of prophylaxis errors (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.4) and a duration of surgical drainage for more than 3 days (OR, 2.679; 95% CI, 1.009 to 7.113) predicted SSI. By multivariate analysis, errors in individual antibiotic prophylaxis measures were not significantly associated with SSI; however, the presence of more than two errors was significant (OR, 4.030; 95% CI, 1.018 to 15.96). A strong correlation was identified between the degree of concordance to SSI prevention guidelines and the SSI rate (P = 0.001, Mantel-Haenszel linear-by-linear association chi-square test).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Surgical site infection (n=216). More than two antibiotic prophylaxis errors vs. Two or fewer antibiotic prophylaxis errors was evaluated on Surgical site infection (OR 4.030, 95% CI 1.018 to 15.96, p=0.001). The presence of more than two antibiotic prophylaxis errors was significantly associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (OR 4.030; 95% CI 1.018 to 15.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: