Review summarizes challenges of polygenic risk scores in drug response, suggesting pathways for clinical use.
Inter-individual variability in drug response remains a major challenge in clinical pharmacology. While clinical pharmacogenetics is largely based on actionable single-gene variants, increasing GWAS evidence indicates that many drug-response phenotypes are polygenic. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer a framework to capture cumulative effects across pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and disease-related pathways, enabeling probabilistic risk stratification beyond monogenic models. This review summarizes the current status of PRS in pharmacogenomics (PGx-PRS), highlighting key challenges including limited sample sizes of drug-exposed cohorts, heterogeneous phenotype definitions, ancestry-related portability issues, and incomplete representation of complex pharmacogenes such as CPY2D6 . Current applications are discussed across cardiovascular, psychiatric, and oncological settings, where PRS show emerging potential for benefit-risk stratification but remain insufficiently validated for routine care. Clinical implementation will require standardized methodologies multi-ancestry validation, integration with rare-high impact ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion) variants, and clearer regulatory pathways. With these advances, PGx-PRS may become clinically relevant tools for precision prescribing and drug development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mathey et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: