Key result
Medicaid/Uninsured patients had higher odds of 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays (aOR 1.71; 95% CI 1.39-2.11) and readmissions (aOR 1.35) compared to privately insured patients.
Why the study?
Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program disproportionately penalizes safety-net hospitals, prompting assessment of how insurance type associates with 30-day outcomes and costs.
Does insurance type affect 30-day EDOS, readmissions, and costs in surgical patients at a safety-net hospital?
Cohort (n=6,129)
No
Does insurance type affect 30-day EDOS, readmissions, and costs in surgical patients at a safety-net hospital?
Odds Ratio: 1.71 (95% CI 1.39–2.11)
p-value: p=<.001
Medicaid/Uninsured patients at safety-net hospitals have higher rates of urgent surgeries, leading to increased complications, readmissions, and costs compared to privately insured patients.
Insurance status associated with higher post-surgical ED visits/readmissions; leaves open equity interventions to reduce disparities.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of Private, Medicare, and Medicaid/Uninsured insurance type with 30-day Emergency Department visits/Observation Stays (EDOS), readmissions, and costs in a safety-net hospital (SNH) serving diverse socioeconomic status patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) disproportionately penalizes SNHs. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used inpatient National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) data merged with cost data. Frailty, expanded Operative Stress Score, case status, and insurance type were used to predict odds of EDOS and readmissions, as well as index hospitalization costs. RESULTS: The cohort had 1,477 Private; 1,164 Medicare; and 3,488 Medicaid/Uninsured cases with a patient mean age 52.1 years [SD=14.7] and 46.8% of the cases were performed on male patients. Medicaid/Uninsured (aOR=2.69, CI=2.38-3.05, P<.001) and Medicare (aOR=1.32, CI=1.11-1.56, P=.001) had increased odds of urgent/emergent surgeries and complications versus Private patients. Despite having similar frailty distributions, Medicaid/Uninsured compared to Private patients had higher odds of EDOS (aOR=1.71, CI=1.39-2.11, P<.001), and readmissions (aOR=1.35, CI=1.11-1.65, P=.004), after adjusting for frailty, OSS, and case status, while Medicare patients had similar odds of EDOS and readmissions versus Private. Hospitalization variable cost %change was increased for Medicare (12.5%) and Medicaid/Uninsured (5.9%), but Medicaid/Uninsured was similar to Private after adjusting for urgent/emergent cases. CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates and odds of urgent/emergent cases in Medicaid/Uninsured patients drive increased odds of complications and index hospitalization costs versus Private. SNHs care for higher cost populations while receiving lower reimbursements and are further penalized by the unintended consequences of HRRP. Increasing access to care, especially for Medicaid/Uninsured patients, could reduce urgent/emergent surgeries resulting in fewer complications, EDOS/readmissions, and costs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobs et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Inpatient surgical cases (n=6,129). Medicaid/Uninsured insurance vs. Private insurance was evaluated on 30-day Emergency Department visits/Observation Stays (EDOS) (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.39-2.11, p=<.001). Medicaid/Uninsured patients had higher odds of 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays (aOR 1.71; 95% CI 1.39-2.11) and readmissions (aOR 1.35) compared to privately insured patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: