Key result
Medicaid is linked to ~47% lower odds of textbook outcomes versus private insurance, driving higher costs.
Why the study?
Surgical outcome and cost analyses typically focus on single outcomes and do not include encounters beyond the index hospitalization.
Does insurance type affect the odds of achieving textbook outcomes and cumulative costs in patients undergoing inpatient surgery?
Cohort (n=6,322)
Yes
Does insurance type affect the odds of achieving textbook outcomes and cumulative costs in patients undergoing inpatient surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Medicaid and uninsured patients undergoing inpatient surgery have lower rates of textbook outcomes and higher cumulative costs, partially driven by higher presentation acuity.
BACKGROUND: Surgical outcome/cost analyses typically focus on single outcomes and do not include encounters beyond the index hospitalization. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study used NSQIP (2013-2019) data with electronic health record and cost data risk-adjusted for frailty, preoperative acute serious conditions (PASC), case status, and operative stress assessing cumulative costs of failure to achieve textbook outcomes defined as absence of 30-day Clavien-Dindo level III and IV complications, emergency department visits/observation stays (EDOS), and readmissions across insurance types (private, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured). Return costs were defined as costs of all 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays and readmissions. RESULTS: Cases were performed on patients (private 1,506; Medicare 1,218; Medicaid 1,420; uninsured 2,178) with a mean age 52.3 years (SD 14.7) and 47.5% male. Medicaid and uninsured patients had higher odds of presenting with preoperative acute serious conditions (adjusted odds ratios 1.89 and 1.81, respectively) and undergoing urgent/emergent surgeries (adjusted odds ratios 2.23 and 3.02, respectively) vs private. Medicaid and uninsured patients had lower odds of textbook outcomes (adjusted odds ratios 0.53 and 0.78, respectively) and higher odds of emergency department visits/observation stays and readmissions vs private. Not achieving textbook outcomes was associated with a greater than 95.1% increase in cumulative costs. Medicaid patients had a relative increase of 23.1% in cumulative costs vs private, which was 18.2% after adjusting for urgent/emergent cases. Return costs were 37.5% and 65.8% higher for Medicaid and uninsured patients, respectively, vs private. CONCUSIONS: Higher costs for Medicaid patients were partially driven by increased presentation acuity (increased rates/odds of preoperative acute serious conditions and urgent/emergent surgeries) and higher rates of multiple emergency department visits/observation stays and readmission occurrences. Decreasing surgical costs/improving outcomes should focus on reducing urgent/emergent surgeries and improving postoperative care coordination, especially for Medicaid and uninsured populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobs et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Inpatient Surgery (n=6,322). Medicaid or uninsured status vs. Private insurance was evaluated on Textbook outcomes (absence of 30-day Clavien-Dindo level III and IV complications, emergency department visits/observation stays, and readmissions) (OR 0.53 (Medicaid), OR 0.78 (uninsured)). Medicaid and uninsured patients had lower odds of achieving textbook outcomes (adjusted ORs 0.53 and 0.78) compared to privately insured patients, driving higher cumulative surgical costs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: