Key result
Pre-ablation left atrial appendage ejection fraction was lower in patients with atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation compared to arrhythmia-free controls.
Why the study?
Left atrium changes are implicated in the atrial fibrillation substrate, and the authors aimed to elucidate the association between left atrial appendage indices and late arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation.
Do pre-ablation left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices predict late arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Meta-Analysis (n=8,000)
Do pre-ablation left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices predict late arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation?
Pre-ablation LAA functional and anatomic indices, such as ejection fraction, emptying velocity, volume, and orifice area, are predictive of late arrhythmia recurrence after AF ablation, whereas LAA morphology is not.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid recurrence risk stratification before AF ablation; extends observational data but requires prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Left atrium changes are implicated in atrial fibrillation (AF) substrate and are predictive of AF outcomes. Left atrial appendage (LAA) is an integral component of left atrial structure and could be affected by atrial cardiomyopathy. We aimed to elucidate the association between LAA indices and late arrhythmia recurrence after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA). METHODS: The MEDLINE database, ClinicalTrials.gov, medRxiv and Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating LAA and late arrhythmia recurrence in patients undergoing AFCA. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The primary endpoint was pre-ablation difference in LAA anatomic or functional indices. RESULTS: A total of 34 studies were found eligible and five LAA indices were analyzed. LAA ejection fraction and LAA emptying velocity were significantly lower in patients with AF recurrence post-ablation [SMD = - 0.66; 95% CI (- 1.01, - 0.32) and SMD = - 0.56; 95% CI (- 0.73, - 0.40) respectively] as compared to arrhythmia free controls. LAA volume and LAA orifice area were significantly higher in patients with AF recurrence post-ablation (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI 0.35-0.67, and SMD = 0.35; 95% CI 0.20-0.49, respectively) as compared to arrhythmia free controls. LAA morphology was not predictive of AF recurrence post-ablation (chicken wing morphology; OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.79-2.02). Moderate statistical heterogeneity and small case-control studies are the main limitations of our meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that LAA ejection fraction, LAA emptying velocity, LAA orifice area and LAA volume differ between patients suffering from arrhythmia recurrence post-ablation and arrhythmia free counterparts, while LAA morphology is not predictive of AF recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Papathanasiou et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation (n=8,000). Left atrial appendage morphofunctional indices vs. Arrhythmia free controls was evaluated on Pre-ablation difference in left atrial appendage ejection fraction (SMD -0.66, 95% CI -1.01, -0.32, p=0.0002). Pre-ablation left atrial appendage ejection fraction was lower in patients with atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation compared to arrhythmia-free controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: