Perspective outlines data challenges for risk assessment in toxicology, suggesting AI strategies for improvement.
Environmental human health assessment requires reliable, comprehensive, and standardized toxicology data to support regulatory decision-making. Yet, existing databases remain fragmented, with narrow and imbalanced coverage of species and organs, incomplete dose-response relationships, and inconsistent validation chains, limiting their utility for risk prediction. Meanwhile, regulatory and technological shifts toward AI-based computational models highlight the urgency of building high-quality toxicology databases as the foundation of next-generation methodologies. This perspective outlines key challenges in data curation, harmonization, and accessibility and presents strategic solutions, including building confidence grading frameworks to leverage heterogeneous data sets, using novel high-throughput platforms to generate interaction data with high accuracy and efficiency, and facilitating community-based data sharing. We further emphasize the development of AI-enabled strategies to improve the organization, interoperability, and usability of toxicological data infrastructures in support of AI-driven environmental toxicology and mechanism-based human health risk assessment. These strategies include integrating knowledge networks to construct mechanism-informed AI models, applying transfer learning frameworks that bridge large-scale pretraining with small-sample fine-tuning, and leveraging knowledge graph enhancement and prompt learning to predict systematic "Exposure-Biology-Disease" interactions. These efforts can transform fragmented resources into systematic, interpretable, and predictive systems. We concluded that building high-quality toxicology databases can accelerate the transition to AI-driven toxicology, providing a foundation for more reliable risk assessment and stronger global environmental health protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: