Key result
Beta-blockers in ACS without heart failure are not associated with lower 1-year death or MI.
Why the study?
The clinical benefits of beta-blockers in patients with ACS without chronic HF or LVEF < 40% remain uncertain.
Does beta-blocker therapy reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes without heart failure or reduced ejection fraction?
Cohort (n=1,315)
Yes
Does beta-blocker therapy reduce the risk of death or myocardial infarction in patients with acute coronary syndromes without heart failure or reduced ejection fraction?
In patients with acute coronary syndromes without heart failure or reduced ejection fraction, routine beta-blocker therapy at discharge does not significantly reduce the 1-year risk of death or myocardial infarction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support routine β-blocker use post-ACS without HF or reduced LVEF; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs.
AIMS: The benefits of β-blockers in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) without chronic heart failure (HF) or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% remain uncertain. We evaluated the association between β-blocker therapy and clinical outcomes in a multicenter, contemporary ACS registry. METHODS: In the START-ANTIPLATELET registry (NCT02219984), patients were excluded if they had HF or LVEF <40%. Participants were stratified according to β-blocker use at discharge after ACS. A target trial emulation and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. RESULTS: The primary analysis included 1,315 patients with ACS without HF or LVEF <40%, of whom 949 (72.2%) were discharged on β-blockers. At 1 year, the primary endpoint occurred in 21 (2.2%) patients receiving β-blockers versus 13 (3.6%) without β-blockers, and no significant association was observed (unweighted HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.31-1.26; p = 0.192; IPTW-adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33-1.33; p = 0.249). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested a potentially more favourable association of β-blocker therapy in patients with ST-segment elevation MI (p-interaction=0.049), although this finding was not uniformly reproduced across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In a contemporary real-world cohort of ACS patients without HF or LVEF <40%, β-blocker therapy was prescribed in approximately 70% of patients and was not associated with a lower 1-year risk of death or MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sio et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndromes without heart failure or reduced ejection fraction (n=1,315). Beta-blocker therapy vs. No beta-blocker therapy was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.33-1.33, p=0.249). Beta-blocker therapy at discharge in ACS patients without heart failure or LVEF <40% was not associated with a lower 1-year risk of death or MI (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.33-1.33; p=0.249).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: