Key result
This editorial highlights the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the benefit of beta-blocker therapy after acute coronary syndromes in patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Why the study?
There are gaps in evidence regarding the benefit of beta-blocker therapy after ACS in patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Beta-blocker use at discharge was associated with lower mortality only in LVEF ≤40%; leaves open benefit in preserved EF and requires randomized trials.
Despite significant advances in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) over recent decades, there are still some gaps in evidence.The importance of beta-blockers in the context of pharmacological treatment during and after an ACS is well recognized.The indications concerning patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and ejection fraction (EF) <40% are clear.Unless there is a contraindication or the patient is in overt heart failure, the European and American guidelines confer a class I recommendation for beta-blocker use after both ST-and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS).1---4 The data are not as conclusive in patients without LV dysfunction.Several registries, meta-analyses and population-based studies question this indication, 5 especially in the setting of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.6 In their paper published in the current issue of the Journal, Velásquez-Rodríguez et al. focus on this issue.7 Despite the limitations of their observational study, which
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Ilídio Moreira (2021) conducted an editorial in Myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome. Beta-blocker therapy was evaluated. This editorial highlights the lack of conclusive evidence regarding the benefit of beta-blocker therapy after acute coronary syndromes in patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: