Key result
Intensified blood-pressure control reduced the risk of a 50% decline in GFR or progression to end-stage renal disease compared to conventional control (29.9% vs 41.7%; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.94; P=0.02).
Why the study?
Does intensified blood-pressure control reduce the progression of renal failure in children with chronic kidney disease receiving high-dose ACE inhibitors?
RCT (n=385)
Does intensified blood-pressure control reduce the progression of renal failure in children with chronic kidney disease receiving high-dose ACE inhibitors?
Intensified blood-pressure control targeting a 24-hour mean arterial pressure below the 50th percentile significantly delays the progression of renal failure in children with chronic kidney disease.
Intensified BP control targeting MAP below the 50th percentile should be considered in children with CKD on ACE inhibitors; extends adult renal-protection data to pediatrics.
BACKGROUND: Although inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system delays the progression of renal failure in adults with chronic kidney disease, the blood-pressure target for optimal renal protection is controversial. We assessed the long-term renoprotective effect of intensified blood-pressure control among children who were receiving a fixed high dose of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. METHODS: After a 6-month run-in period, 385 children, 3 to 18 years of age, with chronic kidney disease (glomerular filtration rate of 15 to 80 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area) received ramipril at a dose of 6 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day. Patients were randomly assigned to intensified blood-pressure control (with a target 24-hour mean arterial pressure below the 50th percentile) or conventional blood-pressure control (mean arterial pressure in the 50th to 95th percentile), achieved by the addition of antihypertensive therapy that does not target the renin-angiotensin system; patients were followed for 5 years. The primary end point was the time to a decline of 50% in the glomerular filtration rate or progression to end-stage renal disease. Secondary end points included changes in blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, and urinary protein excretion. RESULTS: A total of 29.9% of the patients in the group that received intensified blood-pressure control reached the primary end point, as assessed by means of a Kaplan-Meier analysis, as compared with 41.7% in the group that received conventional blood-pressure control (hazard ratio, 0.65; confidence interval, 0.44 to 0.94; P=0.02). The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to the type or incidence of adverse events or the cumulative rates of withdrawal from the study (28.0% vs. 26.5%). Proteinuria gradually rebounded during ongoing ACE inhibition after an initial 50% decrease, despite persistently good blood-pressure control. Achievement of blood-pressure targets and a decrease in proteinuria were significant independent predictors of delayed progression of renal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Intensified blood-pressure control, with target 24-hour blood-pressure levels in the low range of normal, confers a substantial benefit with respect to renal function among children with chronic kidney disease. Reappearance of proteinuria after initial successful pharmacologic blood-pressure control is common among children who are receiving long-term ACE inhibition. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00221845.)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wühl et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in chronic kidney disease (n=385). Intensified blood-pressure control vs. Conventional blood-pressure control (mean arterial pressure in the 50th to 95th percentile) was evaluated on time to a decline of 50% in the glomerular filtration rate or progression to end-stage renal disease (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.94, p=0.02). Intensified blood-pressure control reduced the risk of a 50% decline in GFR or progression to end-stage renal disease compared to conventional control (29.9% vs 41.7%; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.44-0.94; P=0.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: