Key result
Compared with vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk 1.25).
Why the study?
How should gastrointestinal bleeding be managed and prevented in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants?
How should gastrointestinal bleeding be managed and prevented in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants?
Relative Risk: 1.25
This review outlines the therapeutic management and preventive measures for gastrointestinal bleeding in patients on DOACs, emphasizing the role of renal function assessment and specific reversal agents.
May warrant GI bleed caution with DOACs in high-risk patients; leaves open individualized agent selection.
The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was an important step forward in the management of atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism (VTE). The DOACs, anti-IIa for dabigatran and anti-Xa for rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban, all have a rapid onset of action and a short half life. There is no need for routine hemostasis testing for treatment monitoring of a DOAC. Compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), DOACs may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk 1.25). Withholding the DOAC treatment, evaluating the time of the last intake and estimating the patient's renal function are the first steps in the management of gastrointestinal bleeding. For patients without impaired renal function, achieving low coagulation takes around 24 h after the last intake of a DOAC. The use of DOAC antagonists will be helpful in controlling bleeding in the most severe and urgent situations. Idarucizumab is available for clinical use for dabigatran and andexanet is currently being reviewed by drug agencies for rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban. It is important to assess the bleeding risk associated with the planned procedure, and the patient's renal function before withholding DOAC therapy for a scheduled intervention. It is mandatory to strengthen the local hemostasis strategies in DOAC-treated patients undergoing a therapeutic endoscopic procedure. Resuming or not resuming anticoagulation with a DOAC after bleeding or a risky procedure depends on the thrombotic and bleeding risk as well as the procedure involved. This discussion should always involve the cardiologist and decisions should be taken by a pluridisciplinary team.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deutsch et al. (2017) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Gastrointestinal bleeding (RR 1.25). Compared with vitamin K antagonists, direct oral anticoagulants may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (relative risk 1.25).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: