Key result
Corrected QT interval dispersion >97 msec predicted early mortality in acute pulmonary embolism with 83.3% sensitivity and 82.7% specificity (p<0.001), proving superior to P wave dispersion.
Why the study?
Do corrected QT interval dispersion and P wave dispersion predict early death in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=93)
No
Do corrected QT interval dispersion and P wave dispersion predict early death in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
p-value: p=<0.001
Corrected QT interval dispersion is a superior electrocardiographic marker compared to P wave dispersion for identifying acute pulmonary embolism patients at high risk of early death.
May support ECG risk stratification in acute PE; leaves open incremental value over validated scores.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to demonstrate and compare to each other the relations of QT and P wave dispersions with early death in the course of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The archive data of 124 patients who had been hospitalized in our hospital with the diagnosis of acute PE between May 2012 and June 2013 was retrospectively reviewed. 93 patients who were in sinus rhythm and whose data were suitable for QT interval and P wave analyses were included to the study. Analyses of corrected QT interval dispersion (QTcd) and P wave dispersion (Pd) were performed for each patients. RESULTS: Among the study population, 12 patients (13%) died and 81 patients (87%) lived after the diagnosis of PE. PD values of deaths were significantly higher than those who survived (59.2±21.2 msec versus 44.8±13.5 msec respectively, p=0.04). Moreover, QTcd values of deaths were also significantly higher than the survivors (105.5 msec (99-119) versus 80msec (74-88) respectively, p<0.001). The sensitivity of Pd>64.5 msec for prediction of early mortality was found to be 58.3% with a specificity of 97.5% (p=0.017) where the sensitivity of Qtcd> 97 msec for prediction of early mortality was found to be 83.3% with a specificity of 82.7% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Both electrocardiography parameters Pd and QTcd may be used as a good and useful markers. We found that, in comparison to Pd, QTcd is superior to detect those who were under potential high risk and who need more aggressive treatment in the course of acute PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akgüllü et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Acute pulmonary embolism (n=93). QT and P wave dispersions vs. Lower dispersion values was evaluated on Early death (p=<0.001). Corrected QT interval dispersion >97 msec predicted early mortality in acute pulmonary embolism with 83.3% sensitivity and 82.7% specificity (p<0.001), proving superior to P wave dispersion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: