Key result
Left atrial stimulation via the distal versus proximal coronary sinus resulted in significantly different mean AH intervals (104 ± 28 msec vs 90 ± 18 msec).
Why the study?
Does the site of left atrial stimulation affect the atrium-His (AH) interval in patients undergoing electrophysiological studies?
Observational (n=22)
Does the site of left atrial stimulation affect the atrium-His (AH) interval in patients undergoing electrophysiological studies?
The site of left atrial stimulation significantly affects the AH interval, which must be accounted for during electrophysiological studies of atrioventricular nodal conduction.
Pacing site within the coronary sinus alters AH intervals in many patients; extends prior observations but leaves optimal site standardization open.
Studies in humans have found left atrial stimulation via the coronary sinus (CS) to elicit significantly shorter atrium-His (AH) intervals as compared to right atrial stimulation, but whether pacing at different left atrial sites (anterior vs posterior left atrium, i.e., far distal vs proximal CS) affects the AH interval has not been studied. Hence, in 22 patients, we compared the effects of stimulation from various atrial sites, including anterior high right atrium (HRA), distal CS, mid-CS, and proximal CS, on: stimulus-atrium (SA), AH, and stimulus-His intervals on the His bundle electrogram. Paced cycle length differed for each patient (range 900-350 msec, mean 532 +/- 140 msec), but conduction intervals from different atrial sites were compared using identical cycle length in each patient. The mean SA intervals were 34 +/- 10 msec, 57 +/- 10 msec, 44 +/- 11 msec, and 32 +/- 8 msec with stimulation, respectively, from HRA, distal CS, mid-CS, and proximal CS (each significantly different except for HRA vs proximal CS). The mean AH intervals were 123 +/- 23 msec, 104 +/- 28 msec, 95 +/- 15 msec, and 90 +/- 18 msec with stimulation, respectively, from HRA, distal CS, mid-CS, and proximal CS (each significantly different except for mid-CS vs proximal CS). In 13 patients, the discrepancy in AH intervals during distal versus proximal CS stimulation was > or = 15 msec; in 9 patients this difference was only < or = 10 msec, considered within the range of measurement error. Thus, in a significant portion of patients, discrepant AH intervals were demonstrated during stimulation from the distal versus proximal CS. These previously undescribed observations suggest that electrophysiological studies on atrioventricular nodal conduction that involve left atrial stimulation must take into account actual location of the stimulation site (anterior or posterior) in order to properly interpret the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (1993) reported an observational. Left atrial stimulation via distal coronary sinus vs. Proximal coronary sinus stimulation was evaluated on Mean AH interval (msec). Left atrial stimulation via the distal versus proximal coronary sinus resulted in significantly different mean AH intervals (104 ± 28 msec vs 90 ± 18 msec).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: