Key result
For warfarin reversal, 20% volume replacement with fresh-frozen plasma was inferior to prothrombin complex concentrates in recovering thrombin generation and shortening thrombus formation onset.
Why the study?
Does prothrombin complex concentrate improve warfarin reversal compared to fresh-frozen plasma in vitro and under flow conditions?
Does prothrombin complex concentrate improve warfarin reversal compared to fresh-frozen plasma in vitro and under flow conditions?
In vitro and ex vivo assays demonstrate that prothrombin complex concentrates are superior to fresh-frozen plasma for reversing warfarin-induced anticoagulation, particularly in restoring thrombin generation and clot formation under flow.
In vitro assay differences should not yet alter warfarin reversal practice; leaves open whether they predict clinical haemostatic efficacy.
Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) and fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) have been clinically used for acute warfarin reversal. The recovery of prothrombin time (PT) or international normalised ratio (INR) is often reported as an endpoint, but haemostatic efficacies of PCCs and FFP may not be fully reflected in static clotting test in platelet-poor plasma. Using various in vitro assays, we compared the effects of two PCC preparations (3-factor PCC; Bebulin and 4-factor PCC; Beriplex) and FFP on warfarin reversal under static and flow conditions. First, we added an aliquot of either PCC (0.3 or 0.72 U/ml) or 20% FFP (v/v) to commercial warfarin plasma (INR 3.2, or 10.3), and then measured PT, factor II, factor VII, and thrombin generation. Subsequently, we collected whole blood samples from six consented warfarin-treated patients with mean INR 3.0 ± 0.5 (range 2.5-3.7), and compared clot formation under flow conditions at 280 s-1 before and after addition of either PCC preparation (0.3 and 0.6 U/ml) or 20% of FFP (v/v). PT/INR were restored by either PCC in plasma with INR 3.0, but they were more effectively corrected by 4-factor PCC than 3-factor PCC in plasma with INR 10.3. Effects of FFP were similar to 0.3 U/ml of PCCs in terms of PT, but FFP was less efficacious than PCCs in recovering thrombin generation or factor II levels. In flow experiments, the onset of thrombus formation was shortened by either PCC, but not by FFP, contrary to shortened PT values. For warfarin reversal 20% volume replacement with FFP is inferior to PCCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogawa et al. (2011) studied Warfarin reversal (n=6). Prothrombin complex concentrates (3-factor and 4-factor PCCs) vs. 20% fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) was evaluated on PT, factor II, factor VII, thrombin generation, and clot formation under flow conditions. For warfarin reversal, 20% volume replacement with fresh-frozen plasma was inferior to prothrombin complex concentrates in recovering thrombin generation and shortening thrombus formation onset.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: