Key result
Supratherapeutic INR (>5.0) showed no significant relationship with levels of important vitamin K-dependent factors II and X in patients on chronic warfarin therapy.
Why the study?
Does a supratherapeutic INR (>5.0) correlate with levels of vitamin K-dependent procoagulant factors in patients on long-term warfarin therapy?
Cohort (n=78)
No
Does a supratherapeutic INR (>5.0) correlate with levels of vitamin K-dependent procoagulant factors in patients on long-term warfarin therapy?
Supratherapeutic INR values (>5.0) do not significantly correlate with levels of vitamin K-dependent factors II and X, supporting guideline recommendations to base management on clinical determinants rather than specific INR values.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Poor correlation between ST-INR and factor levels; leaves open whether factor assays should guide reversal over INR alone.
Patients with a supratherapeutic international normalised ratio (ST-INR) are at risk for bleeding. ST-INR is corrected by withholding warfarin therapy and often by supplementing vitamin K or providing vitamin K-dependent factors; the exact therapeutic decision is based on the extent of the prolonged INR. Currently, ST-INRs are frequently observed in clinical practice due to the use of sensitive recombinant tissue thromboplastin reagents and automation. However, there are scant data correlating an ST-INR with various vitamin K-dependent factors. This prospective cohort study, set in a large tertiary care teaching hospital for the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, defined the relationship between ST-INR (>5.0) and measured vitamin K-dependent procoagulant factors. Prothrombin time, INR and vitamin K-dependent factors II, VII, IX and X were measured in 78 patients with an INR > 5.0 (ST-INR) who were on warfarin therapy for more than 2 months. There was no significant relationship between the ST-INR and levels of important vitamin K-dependent factors II and X. These data support the recent guidelines that the management of an INR > 5.0 should be driven by the clinical determinants rather than specific INR values per se.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarode et al. (2005) conducted a cohort in Supratherapeutic international normalised ratio (ST-INR) during warfarin therapy (n=78). Supratherapeutic INR (>5.0) was evaluated on Relationship between ST-INR (>5.0) and measured vitamin K-dependent procoagulant factors (II, VII, IX and X). Supratherapeutic INR (>5.0) showed no significant relationship with levels of important vitamin K-dependent factors II and X in patients on chronic warfarin therapy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: