Key result
A 4-s integrated relaxation pressure cut-off of 6.5 mmHg using water-perfused high resolution manometry highly discriminated achalasia from other patients (AUC 0.997; 95% CI 0.995-1.000; p<0.001).
Why the study?
What is the optimal 4-s IRP cut-off value for diagnosing esophageal achalasia using high-resolution manometry with water-perfused catheters?
Observational (n=742)
No
What is the optimal 4-s IRP cut-off value for diagnosing esophageal achalasia using high-resolution manometry with water-perfused catheters?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.997 (95% CI 0.995-1.000)
p-value: p=< 0.001
A lower 4-s IRP cut-off of 6.5 mmHg is required for diagnosing esophageal achalasia when using water-perfused high-resolution manometry systems compared to solid-state catheters.
Supports revising 4-s IRP thresholds for water-perfused manometry; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Relaxation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is now evaluated calculating 4-second integrated relaxation pressure (4-s IRP) by high resolution manometry (HREPT). Solid-state catheters have been used to define abnormal values. Our aim was to evaluate 4-s IRP in esophageal achalasia using HREPT with perfused catheters. METHODS: From June 2009 to June 2013, 936 HREPT studies have been performed in our unit. Of these, 194 patients having treated achalasia were excluded. Control group was constituted by 695 patients without achalasia, and 47 patients with untreated achalasia constituted the study group. HREPT was performed with water-perfused catheters. To establish the cut-off value for 4-s IRP that better discriminate patients with achalasia from all other patients, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. KEY RESULTS: Twenty three of 47 achalasia patients (49%) showed a 4-s IRP under 15 mmHg; and seven (15%) had a value under modified Chicago criteria. A cut-off value for 4-s IRP of 6.5 mmHg, calculated by ROC analysis, highly discriminates achalasia from the rest of the patients and especially from scleroderma patients (area under the curve: 0.997, 95% CI: 0.995-1.000; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Cut-off values for 4-s IRP defined using HREPT with solid-state catheters are not adequate for diagnosing esophageal achalasia with water-perfused systems. A lower value, i.e., 6.5 mmHg, is suggested for this equipment. The diagnostic criteria of esophageal achalasia should be modified for HREPT performed with water-perfused systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ortiz et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Esophageal achalasia (n=742). High resolution manometry with water-perfused catheters vs. Patients without achalasia was evaluated on Discrimination of achalasia from other patients using 4-s IRP (AUC 0.997, 95% CI 0.995-1.000, p=< 0.001). A 4-s integrated relaxation pressure cut-off of 6.5 mmHg using water-perfused high resolution manometry highly discriminated achalasia from other patients (AUC 0.997; 95% CI 0.995-1.000; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: