Key result
Compared to men, women had more unavailable lateral/posterolateral coronary sinus branches and a higher risk of high left ventricular lead pacing thresholds.
Why the study?
Do women have different coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters compared to men undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Cohort (n=223)
Single-blind
No
Do women have different coronary sinus anatomy and left ventricular lead pacing parameters compared to men undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Women undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy have an anatomical disadvantage with fewer suitable coronary sinus branches, leading to higher left ventricular pacing thresholds compared to men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May complicate LV lead placement in women; leaves open whether anatomy drives sex differences in CRT response.
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested better outcomes from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in women. Gender differences in coronary sinus (CS) anatomy and left ventricular (LV) lead parameters in patients undergoing CRT, however, have not been well studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients, undergoing CRT at the University of California in San Diego Medical Center from 2003 to 2011 were included in this study. The location of the LV lead was assessed on coronary venography and chest X-ray recorded at the time of device implantation. Optimal LV lead position was defined as either mid-lateral or posterolateral LV wall. The relationship between LV lead position (optimal or non-optimal position) and LV lead parameters at completion of implant were compared between genders. No statistically significant gender differences were noted in baseline characteristics. LV lead implantation was successful in 217 patients (97.3%). Lateral or posterolateral CS branches were unavailable in more women than men (26.3% vs. 10.8%, P=0.011). Women had a higher LV lead pacing threshold than men (P=0.003) and gender was an independent risk factor of high LV lead pacing threshold (P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Women had an anatomical disadvantage for LV lead placement and had higher LV lead pacing threshold compared to men. Implanting physicians should be aware of gender differences during LV lead placement in order to maximize CRT benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawata et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=223). Female gender vs. Male gender was evaluated on High left ventricular lead pacing threshold (>2.5 V at 0.5-ms pulse width) (OR 3.57, 95% CI 1.41-8.97, p=0.008). Compared to men, women had more unavailable lateral/posterolateral coronary sinus branches and a higher risk of high left ventricular lead pacing thresholds.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: