Key result
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was associated with primary CVD and major CHD, with effects more pronounced at baseline SBP <120 or >140 mmHg and DBP <70 or >80 mmHg.
Why the study?
There is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease.
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability increase cardiovascular risk in patients in the ACCORD trial?
Observational
Does visit-to-visit blood pressure variability increase cardiovascular risk in patients in the ACCORD trial?
Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability, particularly blood pressure dips, is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, which is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior cardiovascular disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BPv associations with CVD outcomes in diabetes warrant nuanced risk stratification; leaves open whether targeting variability improves prognosis.
OBJECTIVES: As there is uncertainty about the extent to which baseline blood pressure level or cardiovascular risk modifies the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPv) and cardiovascular disease, we comprehensively examined the role of BPv in cardiovascular disease risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) Trial. METHODS: Using data from ACCORD, we examined the relationship of BPv with development of the primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease (CHD), and total stroke using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: BPv was associated with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD but not stroke. The positive association with the primary CVD outcome and major CHD was more pronounced in low and high strata of baseline SBP (<120 and >140 mmHg) and DBP (<70 and >80 mmHg). The effect of BPv on CVD and CHD was more pronounced in those with both prior CVD history and low blood pressure. Dips, not elevations, in blood pressure appeared to drive these associations. The relationships were generally not attenuated by adjustment for mean blood pressure, medication adherence, or baseline comorbidities. A sensitivity analysis using CVD events from the long-term posttrial follow-up (ACCORDION) was consistent with the results from ACCORD. CONCLUSION: In ACCORD, the effect of BPv on adverse cardiovascular (but not cerebrovascular) outcomes is modified by baseline blood pressure and prior CVD. Recognizing these more nuanced relationships may help improve risk stratification and blood pressure management decisions as well as provide insight into potential underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuyujukian et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Diabetes. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was evaluated on Primary CVD outcome, major coronary heart disease, and total stroke. Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability was associated with primary CVD and major CHD, with effects more pronounced at baseline SBP <120 or >140 mmHg and DBP <70 or >80 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: