Key result
Higher insulin resistance (HOMA IR ≥1.8) was associated with greater global severity (P=0.007), extent (P=0.038), and atheroma burden (P=0.035) of coronary artery disease compared to lower IR.
Why the study?
Does insulin resistance predict the angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with clinically suspected CAD?
Cross-Sectional (n=107)
Does insulin resistance predict the angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with clinically suspected CAD?
p-value: p=0.007
Higher degrees of insulin resistance are associated with more severe, extensive, and distal coronary artery disease in patients with suspected CAD.
Insulin resistance associated with greater CAD severity in nondiabetics; hypothesis-generating, requiring prospective studies before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) is frequently observed in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Aim. To examine the association between IR and severity and extent of CAD. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was used to assess coronary atherosclerosis in 107 patients with clinically suspected CAD. QCA-derived indexes reflecting CAD severity, extent, and overall atheroma burden were calculated for the entire coronary tree, and separately for different coronary segments. IR was quantified using the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA IR). Nondiabetic subjects (n = 83) were divided into group 1 (n = 41) with HOMA IR <1.8 (the median value), and group 2 (n = 42) with HOMA IR >or=1.8. Group 3 comprised diabetic subjects (n = 24). RESULTS: Global age- and gender-adjusted indexes for severity (P = 0.007), extent (P = 0.038), and atheroma burden (P = 0.035) of CAD were higher in group 2 than in group 1. Similarly, the global severity (P = 0.027), extent (P = 0.090), and global atheroma burden (P = 0.024) indexes were higher in group 3 compared with group 1. IR was correlated with quantitative angiographic indexes for distal segments only, but not for proximal or mid segments of coronary vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with more severe degree of IR have a more severe, extensive, and distal type of CAD than patients with lower degree of IR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Granér et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in clinically suspected coronary artery disease (n=107). Insulin resistance (HOMA IR ≥1.8 or diabetes) vs. Lower insulin resistance (HOMA IR <1.8) was evaluated on Global age- and gender-adjusted indexes for severity, extent, and atheroma burden of CAD (p=0.007). Higher insulin resistance (HOMA IR ≥1.8) was associated with greater global severity (P=0.007), extent (P=0.038), and atheroma burden (P=0.035) of coronary artery disease compared to lower IR.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: