Key result
Temporary withdrawal of baroreceptor-activating therapy significantly increased ambulatory blood pressure by 10/8 mmHg (P=0.007/0.002), but no patient reached the 35 mmHg primary endpoint.
Why the study?
Does blinded withdrawal of baroreceptor-activating therapy cause a significant rebound increase in blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension?
RCT (n=16)
Blinded
Randomized cross-over
Does blinded withdrawal of baroreceptor-activating therapy cause a significant rebound increase in blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension?
Temporary withdrawal of baroreceptor-activating therapy in long-term carriers leads to a significant but modest rise in blood pressure, suggesting preserved hypertension control mechanisms.
BAT withdrawal raises BP in resistant hypertension; confirms device efficacy in blinded crossover RCT.
BACKGROUND: Baroreceptor-activating therapy (BAT) has been shown to control resistant hypertension in one sham-controlled and further observational studies. Incremental but significant reincrease of blood pressure (BP) have been described after open-label temporary withdrawal of such therapy. METHOD: Our study in 16 randomized patients investigated the course of automated office, ambulatory, and home BP in a randomized, controlled cross-over design. RESULTS: After 4 weeks of blinded and randomized withdrawal in hypertension-controlled long-term carriers of BAT (2.67 ± 1.3 years, 145/104 mmHg), the primary end point of 35 mmHg difference, similar to initial BP drop after BAT initiation, was not reached in any patient. Ambulatory BP rose significantly during BAT off by 10/8 ± 4/3 mmHg (3.13/2.10, P = 0.007/0.002) and automated office BP by 10/4 ± 2/1 (4.17/0.58, P = 0.005/0.03) at 4 weeks after BAT on while mean home BP did not change significantly by 2/2 ± 3/2 mmHg (-5.9/-3.5, P = 0.6/0.5). CONCLUSION: Our data in a limited study population show, that BP rise after temporary BAT withdrawal is significant but does not reach a magnitude comparable with the initial drop after de novo implantation. Such results points to preserved hypertension control after electrical BAT withdrawal and deserves further pathophysiological and clinical clarification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beige et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Resistant hypertension (n=16). Baroreceptor-activating therapy (BAT) withdrawal vs. BAT continuation was evaluated on 35 mmHg difference in blood pressure. Temporary withdrawal of baroreceptor-activating therapy significantly increased ambulatory blood pressure by 10/8 mmHg (P=0.007/0.002), but no patient reached the 35 mmHg primary endpoint.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: