Key result
Perioperative intravenous lidocaine did not significantly reduce postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 hours compared to usual care (13.5 mg vs 13.9 mg; P=0.821).
Why the study?
Opioids are the mainstay of pain management in scoliosis surgery, prompting evaluation of whether perioperative intravenous lidocaine reduces postoperative opioid requirements and pain scores in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Does perioperative intravenous lidocaine reduce postoperative morphine consumption in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery?
Observational (n=115)
No
Does perioperative intravenous lidocaine reduce postoperative morphine consumption in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.5% vs 13.9%
p-value: p=0.821
Perioperative intravenous lidocaine does not reduce postoperative morphine requirements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.
Opioids are the mainstay of pain management in scoliosis surgery. We hypothesized that in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery, perioperative intravenous (IV) lidocaine would reduce postoperative opioid requirement and pain scores. In this retrospective observational before-and-after study, we identified AIS patients who underwent single-stage PSF at a tertiary university hospital from 2020 to 2022. All patients received total intravenous anesthesia. The Lidocaine group received a bolus of 1.5 mg/kg IV lidocaine prior to induction, followed by infusion at 2 mg/kg/h. At wound closure, the rate was reduced to 1 mg/kg/h and continued for 30 min in recovery. All patients received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) morphine postoperatively. The primary outcome was total morphine consumption in the first 24 h. The secondary outcome was mean pain scores over 48 h using a numerical rating scale. We included 115 patients: 59 in the Usual Care group and 56 in the Lidocaine group. Postoperative morphine use in the first 24 h showed no significant difference (Lidocaine: 13.5 ± 8.9 mg vs Usual Care: 13.9 ± 10.6 mg; P = 0.821). The cumulative morphine milligram equivalents per kilogram bodyweight at 48 h was 0.43 mg/kg. Mean pain scores were higher in the Lidocaine group in the first 48 h (4.25 ± 0.37 vs 3.67 ± 1.46; P = 0.03). Perioperative IV lidocaine administered as an analgesic adjunct for AIS surgery did not reduce postoperative morphine requirement. Although pain scores were statistically higher in patients receiving intravenous lidocaine, the difference was minimal and lacked clinical significance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery (n=115). Perioperative intravenous lidocaine vs. Usual Care was evaluated on Total morphine consumption in the first 24 h (p=0.821). Perioperative intravenous lidocaine did not significantly reduce postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 hours compared to usual care (13.5 mg vs 13.9 mg; P=0.821).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: