Key result
Insulin treatment in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes (HR 2.16) compared to diabetic patients not on insulin.
Why the study?
Insulin use is associated with poor outcomes in heart failure, but its effect on LV remodeling, contractility abnormalities, and clinical outcomes in HFrEF specifically was unclear.
Does insulin treatment increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes and adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with HFrEF and T2DM?
Observational (n=377)
No
Does insulin treatment increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes and adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with HFrEF and T2DM?
Hazard Ratio: 2.16 (95% CI 1.08–4.59)
Absolute Event Rate: 29.5% vs 15.4%
p-value: p=0.030
In patients with HFrEF and T2DM, insulin use is associated with adverse left ventricular remodeling, contractile dysfunction, and a significantly increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Insulin is commonly used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) to achieve glycemic control. However, recent evidence showed that insulin use is associated with poor outcomes in the context of heart failure (HF). Since heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for approximately 50% of cases in the general HF population, we aimed to evaluate the effect of insulin treatment on left ventricular (LV) remodeling and contractility abnormalities in a HFrEF cohort and assess whether insulin was a predictor of adverse outcomes in this entity. METHODS: A total of 377 HFrEF patients who underwent cardiac MRI were included and divided according to diabetes status and the need for insulin treatment. LV structural and functional indices, as well as systolic strains, were measured. The determinants of impaired myocardial strains were assessed using linear regression analysis. The associated endpoints were determined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: T2DM patients on insulin displayed a higher indexed LV end-diastolic volume and LV mass than those with T2DM not on insulin or those without T2DM, despite similar LV ejection fractions, accompanied by a higher three-dimensional spherical index (P < 0.01). Worse longitudinal and circumferential peak systolic strain was shown to occur in T2DM patients on insulin (P < 0.01). Insulin treatment was independently associated with impaired magnitudes of systolic strain. The median follow-up duration was 32.4 months (IQR, 15.6-43.2 months). Insulin treatment remained consistently associated with poor outcomes after adjustment for established confounders, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.11; (95% CI, 1.45-6.87; P = 0.009) in the overall cohort and 2.16 (95% CI, 1.08-4.59; P = 0.030) in the diabetes cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin may further lead to adverse LV remodeling and contractile dysfunction in the context of HFrEF with T2DM. Considerable care should be taken when treating HFrEF patients with insulin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (n=377). Insulin treatment vs. Type 2 diabetes patients not on insulin was evaluated on Composite of HF readmission, all-cause mortality, and heart transplantation (HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.08-4.59, p=0.030). Insulin treatment in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and type 2 diabetes was associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse clinical outcomes (HR 2.16) compared to diabetic patients not on insulin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: