Key result
Perioperative management of subcutaneous defibrillators has significantly evolved, and contemporary experience suggests that these procedures are associated with minimal complications.
Why the study?
To review peri-procedural interventions and management approaches to minimize complications associated with S-ICD during implant and follow-up.
How can peri-procedural complications be minimized during subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation?
How can peri-procedural complications be minimized during subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation?
Contemporary perioperative management of S-ICD is associated with minimal complications, supporting its preferential use in younger patients and those at high infection risk.
S-ICD may lower lead complications; leaves open optimal peri-procedural strategies to minimize residual risks.
INTRODUCTION: Subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) is the latest development in the clinically available devices for sudden cardiac death prevention. Experience from pivotal trials and post-marketing studies has proven the feasibility and safety of S-ICD. Extra-cardiac location of S-ICD obviates the need for transvenous leads which translates into lower incidence of lead-related complications and systemic infections. This is a review on peri-procedural interventions to minimize complications associated with S-ICD during implant and follow-up. AREAS COVERED: This paper will highlight the results of pertinent studies related to perioperative management of S-ICD and review the approaches to minimize the risk of complications such as hematoma at the pulse generator location, unsuccessful defibrillation due to suboptimal S-ICD lead and generator position, postoperative pain, inappropriate shocks due to T wave oversensing and interaction with concomitant cardiac implantable devices. An extensive literature search was performed to identify the relevant articles. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The use of S-ICD is expanding, and the published results suggest a preferential use of such devices for younger patients and those with a potential risk of infection from intravascular devices. The perioperative management of S-ICD has significantly evolved during a decade of experience. Contemporary experience suggests that these procedures are associated with minimal complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Afzal et al. (2020) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac death prevention requiring subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD). Peri-procedural interventions for subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) implant was evaluated on Peri-procedural complications (hematoma, unsuccessful defibrillation, postoperative pain, inappropriate shocks). Perioperative management of subcutaneous defibrillators has significantly evolved, and contemporary experience suggests that these procedures are associated with minimal complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: