Key result
In rabbit hearts, an intact pericardium prevented sustained atrial fibrillation despite pressures >20 cmH2O, whereas removal allowed reliable induction at >15 cmH2O, implicating atrial stretch.
Why the study?
Does passive pericardial constraint prevent stretch-induced atrial fibrillation in rabbit hearts subjected to increased atrial pressure?
Does passive pericardial constraint prevent stretch-induced atrial fibrillation in rabbit hearts subjected to increased atrial pressure?
Passive pericardial constraint limits atrial stretch and prevents the induction of atrial fibrillation during acute atrial volume loading, suggesting AF vulnerability relies on stretch rather than pressure alone.
Intact pericardium may limit stretch-induced AF; hypothesis-generating for human pericardial interventions, needs clinical validation.
Atrial fibrillation is more common in conditions with elevated atrial pressure and can be induced experimentally with acute increases in atrial pressure. We examined the effect of increased atrial pressure with and without pericardial constraint to better separate the effects of increased pressure and atrial stretch. In Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts with intact pericardium, after ligating the pulmonary and caval veins, intra-atrial pressures were increased in a stepwise manner by adjusting the pulmonary outflow cannula. Rapid burst pacing was applied to induce atrial fibrillation at increasing intra-atrial pressures from 0 to 24 cmH(2)O. The atrial refractory period was recorded at each pressure using a single extra stimulus. The protocol was repeated after the pericardium was removed. When the pericardium was intact, atrial stretch was limited by passive constraint, and sustained atrial fibrillation could not be induced despite atrial pressures in excess of 20 cmH(2)O. In contrast, when the pericardium was removed, atrial fibrillation could be reliably induced when atrial pressure exceeded 15 cmH(2)O. This suggests that the electrophysiological effects of acute atrial volume loading rely on atrial stretch rather than increased atrial pressure alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ninio et al. (2006) studied Atrial fibrillation. Intact pericardium during increased atrial pressure vs. Pericardium removed was evaluated on Induction of sustained atrial fibrillation. In rabbit hearts, an intact pericardium prevented sustained atrial fibrillation despite pressures >20 cmH2O, whereas removal allowed reliable induction at >15 cmH2O, implicating atrial stretch.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: