Why the study?
Fluid administration and hemodynamic monitoring are directly related to postoperative outcomes, but the 2021 Spanish Intensified Adult Recovery (RICA) guideline recommendations required review regarding their methodology.
The SEDAR subcommittee challenges the RICA guideline's recommendations on perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring, calling for their revision due to methodological flaws.
Clinicians should exercise caution with RICA fluid therapy recommendations; this challenges existing guidelines and leaves open the need for rigorous revisions.
In an effort to standardize perioperative management and improve postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing surgery, the Ministry of Health, through the Spanish Multimodal Rehabilitation Group (GERM), and the Aragonese Institute of Health Sciences, in collaboration with multiple Spanish scientific societies and based on the available evidence, published in 2021 the Spanish Intensified Adult Recovery (RICA) guideline. This document includes 12 perioperative measures related to fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring. Fluid administration and hemodynamic monitoring are not straightforward but are directly related to postoperative patient outcomes. The Fluid Therapy and Hemodynamic Monitoring Subcommittee of the Hemostasis, Transfusion Medicine and Fluid Therapy Section (SHTF) of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Critical Care (SEDAR) has reviewed these recommendations and concluded that they should be revised as they do not follow an adequate methodology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ripollés‐Melchor et al. (2023) conducted a review in Perioperative management of adult patients undergoing surgery. RICA guideline recommendations on fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring was evaluated. The SEDAR subcommittee concluded that the 12 perioperative fluid therapy and hemodynamic monitoring recommendations in the Spanish RICA guideline should be revised due to inadequate methodology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: