Why the study?
Establishing and constantly re-evaluating appropriate threshold values of perioperative hemodynamic parameters is important for managing immediate- to high-risk surgical patients with narrow safety margins.
This narrative review highlights the importance of appropriate perioperative hemodynamic fluid therapy and monitoring for immediate- to high-risk patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Re-evaluation of perioperative hemodynamic thresholds remains essential in high-risk surgical patients; leaves open the need for prospective validation studies.
The rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality during major surgery have shown a declining trend due to improvements in hemodynamic monitoring and fluid assessment. However, several million surgical procedures involving aged patients and those with multiple comorbidities are performed every year worldwide. Thus, the establishment and constant re-evaluation of appropriate threshold values of perioperative hemodynamic parameters for the management of immediate- to high-risk patients with a narrow safety margin are especially important. Perioperative fluid balance is an important independent risk factor of postoperative morbidity and mortality. In this article, we provide an overview of intraoperative hemodynamic fluid resuscitation and fluid-response monitoring during non-cardiac surgery. We also focus on targets at the macrocirculatory, microcirculatory, and cellular levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petsakul et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: