Key result
The combination of decreased heart rate variability (SDNN <100 ms) and carcinoid heart disease was associated with significantly worse prognosis compared to preserved HRV and no heart disease (p=0.04).
Why the study?
Does decreased heart rate variability combined with carcinoid heart disease predict mortality in patients with carcinoid syndrome?
Cohort (n=35)
No
Does decreased heart rate variability combined with carcinoid heart disease predict mortality in patients with carcinoid syndrome?
The combination of carcinoid heart disease and decreased heart rate variability (SDNN <100 ms) identifies patients with carcinoid syndrome at the highest risk of mortality.
May warrant closer monitoring in high-risk carcinoid patients; leaves open whether HRV-targeted strategies improve outcomes.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recently, a decrease in heart rate variability measures was found in patients with carcinoid syndrome suffering from carcinoid heart disease compared to those without cardiac involvement of carcinoid syndrome. The prognostic relevance of this finding, however, was not clear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Therefore, 35 patients with carcinoid syndrome (21 men, age 56 +/- 11 years), all of them suffering from metastatic carcinoid tumors, were followed prospectively at our institution. Digital 24-hour Holter monitoring, echocardiography, and serum serotonin and urine 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5-HIAA) samplings were performed in all study patients at baseline. Indices of time domain heart rate variability obtained from Holter recordings included the standard deviation of all normal RR intervals (SDNN) representing overall variability, the square root of the mean of the squared differences between adjacent normal RR intervals (rMSSD), and the percentage of the number of pairs of adjacent normal RR intervals differing by >50 ms (pNN50), both indices reflecting predominantly vagal influences on heart rate. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 18 +/- 7 months, 15 of 35 patients with carcinoid syndrome (43%) died. Patients with cardiac manifestation of the carcinoid syndrome showed a tendency towards an increased mortality in comparison to patients without cardiac involvement (p = 0.09). Patients with the combination of decreased heart rate variability (SDNN <100 ms) and presence of carcinoid heart disease had a significant worse prognosis (p = 0.04) compared to patients without carcinoid heart disease and preserved heart rate variability (SDNN > or =100 ms). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of carcinoid heart disease in combination with decreased heart rate variability is associated with the most adverse prognosis in the setting of carcinoid syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoffmann et al. (2001) conducted a cohort in Carcinoid syndrome with metastatic carcinoid tumors (n=35). Decreased heart rate variability (SDNN <100 ms) and carcinoid heart disease vs. Preserved heart rate variability (SDNN ≥100 ms) and no carcinoid heart disease was evaluated on Prognosis (mortality) (p=0.04). The combination of decreased heart rate variability (SDNN <100 ms) and carcinoid heart disease was associated with significantly worse prognosis compared to preserved HRV and no heart disease (p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: