Key result
Both contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MRI allowed for precise visualization of therapeutic lesions with high contrast-to-noise ratios minutes to hours after radiofrequency ablation.
Why the study?
Can contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MRI accurately visualize ablation lesions immediately after radiofrequency ablation in interventional electrophysiology?
Observational (n=24)
Can contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MRI accurately visualize ablation lesions immediately after radiofrequency ablation in interventional electrophysiology?
Nonenhanced T2-weighted MRI is feasible for intraprocedural monitoring of ablation success, allowing precise lesion visualization within minutes of radiofrequency delivery.
Intraprocedural MRI lesion imaging is feasible in animal models; leaves open clinical translation and outcome impact in human electrophysiology.
BACKGROUND: Imaging of myocardial ablation lesions during electrophysiology procedures would enable superior guidance of interventions and immediate identification of potential complications. The aim of this study was to establish clinically suitable MRI-based imaging techniques for intraprocedural lesion visualization in interventional electrophysiology. METHODS AND RESULTS: Interventional electrophysiology was performed under magnetic resonance guidance in an animal model, using a custom setup including magnetic resonance-conditional catheters. Various pulse sequences were explored for intraprocedural lesion visualization after radiofrequency ablation. The developed visualization techniques were then used to investigate lesion formation in patients immediately after ablation of atrial flutter. The animal studies in 9 minipigs showed that gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced T1-weighted and nonenhanced T2-weighted pulse sequences are particularly suitable for lesion visualization immediately after radiofrequency ablation. MRI-derived lesion size correlated well with autopsy (R(2)=0.799/0.709 for contrast-enhanced/nonenhanced imaging). Non-contrast agent-enhanced techniques were suitable for repetitive lesion visualization during electrophysiological interventions, thus allowing for intraprocedural monitoring of ablation success. The patient studies in 24 patients with typical atrial flutter several minutes to hours after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation confirmed the results from the animal experiments. Therapeutic lesions could be visualized in all patients using contrast-enhanced and also nonenhanced MRI with high contrast-to-noise ratio (94.6±35.2/111.1±32.6 versus 48.0±29.0/68.0±37.3 for ventricular/atrial lesions and contrast-enhanced versus nonenhanced imaging). CONCLUSIONS: MRI allows for precise lesion visualization in electrophysiological interventions just minutes after radiofrequency ablation. Nonenhanced T2-weighted MRI is particularly feasible for intraprocedural delineation of lesion formation as lesions are detectable within minutes after radiofrequency delivery and imaging can be repeated during interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nordbeck et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Atrial flutter (n=24). Contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MRI was evaluated on Lesion visualization and contrast-to-noise ratio. Both contrast-enhanced and nonenhanced MRI allowed for precise visualization of therapeutic lesions with high contrast-to-noise ratios minutes to hours after radiofrequency ablation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: