Key result
Residence in non-Allegheny study sites was associated with a higher risk of stroke compared to Allegheny County, partially explained by baseline white matter grade.
Why the study?
Does geographic location (non-Allegheny vs Allegheny sites) affect stroke incidence in older adults?
Cohort (n=5,639)
Yes
Does geographic location (non-Allegheny vs Allegheny sites) affect stroke incidence in older adults?
Geographic variations in stroke incidence are only partially explained by traditional risk factors, with white matter grade on MRI accounting for a significant portion of the excess risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Geographic stroke disparities persist beyond traditional risks; leaves open neuroimaging markers and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS), we previously observed lower stroke incidence in Allegheny County, PA compared with the other 3 study sites. The purpose of this study was to study possible reasons for the lower stroke incidence in Allegheny County. METHODS: CHS participants 65 years or older who were stroke-free at baseline (n=5639) were followed between 1989 to 1990 and 2000 for the development of stroke. Risk factors at baseline and their subsequent control were compared among both groups. Site-specific hazard ratios for stroke incidence were calculated using Cox regression models. RESULTS: The unadjusted hazard ratio for total stroke incidence in Forsyth County, NC; Sacramento County, CA; and Washington County, MD combined compared with Allegheny County, PA was 1.74 (95% CI: 1.42, 2.14). After adjustment for age and other traditional risk factors, there was modest reduction of the excess hazard in non-Allegheny sites compared with Allegheny County (hazard ratio=1.52, 95% CI: 1.17, 1.98). Between baseline and the seventh-year visits, control of hypertension, diabetes, lipids, smoking, atrial fibrillation and transient ischemic attack were similar across sites. White matter grade > or = 3 on the baseline brain MRI was less common in Allegheny County (25.8% versus 36.3%, respectively; P<0.001) and accounted for 25% of the excess hazard in non-Allegheny sites compared with Allegheny County. CONCLUSIONS: Site differences in stroke risk factors at baseline and subsequent control only partially explain site differences in stroke incidence. White matter grade as a possible integrated measure of exposure and control of risk factors may help in explaining geographic variations in stroke incidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
El‐Saed et al. (2006) conducted a cohort in Stroke (n=5,639). Residence in non-Allegheny sites (Forsyth County, NC; Sacramento County, CA; Washington County, MD) vs. Residence in Allegheny County, PA was evaluated on total stroke incidence (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.42-2.14). Residence in non-Allegheny study sites was associated with a higher risk of stroke compared to Allegheny County, partially explained by baseline white matter grade.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: