Randomized trial investigates oil recovery from spent coffee grounds using various extraction methods, suggesting efficient bioactive oil production.
This study investigated oil recovery from spent coffee grounds (SCG) using mechanical high-speed-stirring (MHE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), based on isooctane as oil recovering solvent. The impact of varying extraction times for MHE (5, 10, 15 min) and ASE (6, 12 min) on SCG oil yield, fatty acid profile, thermal behaviour, UV–Vis spectrum, caffeine and diterpenes ( i.e. , kahweol and cafestol) contents, antioxidant properties, and oxidative status was assessed, and compared to the results obtained using hexane-based Soxhlet. Application of MHE (∼10 %) and ASE (∼15 %) resulted in lower (−23 %) and higher (+12 %) extraction yields as compared to Soxhlet (∼13 %), respectively. No difference was observed in terms of fatty acid profile and thermal behaviour. Conversely, the application of MHE and ASE yielded significantly higher kahweol (+32 %) and cafestol (+12 %) contents, likely due to low MHE processing temperature and enhanced diterpenes decompartmentalization under pressurized ASE conditions. MHE and ASE were also able to yield a remarkably higher antioxidant activity (∼8-fold and ∼11-fold, respectively) and lower peroxide value (−69 % and −26 %, respectively) than Soxhlet, with MHE showing the lowest peroxide value. Results indicate the possibility to upcycle SCG into bioactive-rich oil using techniques with low investment burden, moderate processing costs, and high readiness levels, showing potential for application in diverse industrial sectors including food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. • Spent coffee ground (SCG) oil was extracted using easy-to-apply techniques. • Mechanical high-speed-stirring and accelerated solvent extraction were selected. • Mechanical and accelerated extraction respectively had the lowest and highest efficiency. • Caffeine and diterpenes recovery was significantly enhanced by pressurized extraction. • Mechanical extraction allowed to obtain highly antioxidant and chemically stable oil.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basso et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: