Key result
Following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 7.6% of patients over a mean follow-up of 3.6 years.
Cohort (n=132)
New-onset atrial fibrillation remains a common complication in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy even after successful relief of LVOT obstruction via alcohol septal ablation.
BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) are at a fourfold to sixfold higher risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) compared to the general population, though incidence rates among patients undergoing alcohol septal ablation (ASA) are not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate atrial fibrillation incidence following ASA. METHODS: We studied 132 consecutive HCM patients without comorbid AF that underwent 154 ASA procedures. The incidence of AF in follow-up was assessed through chart abstraction including electrocardiography. Survival free of AF was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 3.6 ± 2.7 years (maximum 11.3 years), 10 (7.6%) patients developed new-onset AF. Of those who developed AF, both resting and provoked left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradients had improved significantly (difference -79.78 mm Hg, P ≤ 0.005). Severity of mitral regurgitation improved in 7 (70%) patients. Survival free of AF was estimated to be 99.1%, 93.7%, and 91.7% at 1, 3, and 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite relieving LVOT obstruction and improving mitral regurgitation severity via ASA, new-onset AF remained a common complication of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moss et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (n=132). Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) was evaluated on Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation. Following alcohol septal ablation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, new-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 7.6% of patients over a mean follow-up of 3.6 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: