Key result
Combined inhibition of nitric oxide and prostaglandins abolished local hypoxic vasodilatation in the forearm circulation of healthy humans (FVC increase ~3%; NS vs. zero).
Why the study?
Does combined inhibition of NO synthase and cyclooxygenase abolish forearm vasodilatation to systemic hypoxia in healthy adults?
Does combined inhibition of NO synthase and cyclooxygenase abolish forearm vasodilatation to systemic hypoxia in healthy adults?
p-value: p=NS
Combined inhibition of nitric oxide and prostaglandins abolishes local hypoxic vasodilatation in the forearm circulation of healthy humans, indicating a synergistic role for these pathways in regulating peripheral vascular tone.
Findings in healthy adults may not generalize to patients; leaves open independent or synergistic roles of NO and PGs in hypoxic vasodilatation.
We tested the hypothesis that nitric oxide (NO) and vasodilating prostaglandins (PGs) contribute independently to hypoxic vasodilatation, and that combined inhibition would reveal a synergistic role for these two pathways in the regulation of peripheral vascular tone. In 20 healthy adults, we measured forearm blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) and calculated forearm vascular conductance (FVC) responses to steady-state (SS) isocapnic hypoxia (O₂ saturation ~85%). All trials were performed during local α- and β-adrenoceptor blockade (via a brachial artery catheter) to eliminate sympathoadrenal influences on vascular tone and thus isolate local vasodilatory mechanisms. The individual and combined effects of NO synthase (NOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibition were determined by quantifying the vasodilatation from rest to SS hypoxia, as well as by quantifying how each inhibitor reduced vascular tone during hypoxia. Three hypoxia trials were performed in each subject. In group 1 (n = 10), trial 1, 5 min of SS hypoxia increased FVC from baseline (21 ± 3%; P < 0.05). Infusion of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) for 5 min to inhibit NOS during continuous SS hypoxia reduced FVC by -33 ± 3% (P < 0.05). In Trial 2 with continuous NOS inhibition, the increase in FVC from baseline to SS hypoxia was similar to control conditions (20 ± 3%), and infusion of ketorolac for 5 min to inhibit COX during continuous SS hypoxia reduced FVC by -15 ± 3% (P < 0.05). In Trial 3 with combined NOS and COX inhibition, the increase in FVC from baseline to SS hypoxia was abolished (~3%; NS vs. zero). In group 2 (n = 10), the order of NOS and COX inhibition was reversed. In trial 1, five minutes of SS hypoxia increased FVC from baseline (by 24 ± 5%; P < 0.05), and infusion of ketorolac during SS hypoxia had minimal impact on FVC (-4 ± 3%; NS). In Trial 2 with continuous COX inhibition, the increase in FVC from baseline to SS hypoxia was similar to control conditions (27 ± 4%), and infusion of L-NAME during continuous SS hypoxia reduced FVC by -36 ± 7% (P < 0.05). In Trial 3 with combined NOS and COX inhibition, the increase in FVC from baseline to SS hypoxia was abolished (~3%; NS vs. zero). Our collective findings indicate that (1) neither NO nor PGs are obligatory to observe the normal local vasodilatory response from rest to SS hypoxia; (2) NO regulates vascular tone during hypoxia independent of the COX pathway, whereas PGs only regulate vascular tone during hypoxia when NOS is inhibited; and (3) combined inhibition of NO and PGs abolishes local hypoxic vasodilatation (from rest to SS hypoxia) in the forearm circulation of healthy humans during systemic hypoxia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markwald et al. (2011) studied Healthy adults (n=20). Combined inhibition of NO synthase (L-NAME) and cyclooxygenase (ketorolac) vs. Hypoxia alone or single pathway inhibition was evaluated on Increase in forearm vascular conductance (FVC) from baseline to steady-state hypoxia (p=NS). Combined inhibition of nitric oxide and prostaglandins abolished local hypoxic vasodilatation in the forearm circulation of healthy humans (FVC increase ~3%; NS vs. zero).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: