Key result
Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway-concordant care was associated with a lower incidence of stroke or systemic embolic events.
Why the study?
Whether the benefit of Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway-concordant care is consistent across anticoagulants remained unclear.
Does Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway-concordant care improve clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=20,926)
Does Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway-concordant care improve clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ABC pathway-concordant care is associated with significant reductions in adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation, regardless of whether they receive edoxaban or warfarin.
AIMS: The Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway is endorsed by guidelines to improve care of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, whether the benefit of ABC pathway-concordant care is consistent across anticoagulants remains unclear. We assessed the association between ABC-concordant care and outcomes in this post hoc analysis from the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial, which was reported prior to the initial description of the ABC pathway. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were retrospectively classified as receiving ABC-concordant care based on optimal anticoagulation, adequate rate control, management of co-morbidities and lifestyle measures. Associations between ABC-concordance and outcomes were assessed with adjustment for components of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores. Of 20 926 patients, 7915 (37.8%) satisfied criteria of ABC-concordant care, which was associated with significantly lower incidence of stroke or systemic embolic event [stroke/SEE: hazard ratio (HRadj): 0.54; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.47-0.63], major bleeding (HRadj 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58-0.75), major adverse cardiac events (HRadj 0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.58), primary net clinical outcome (composite of stroke/SEE, major bleeding or death; HRadj 0.61; 95% CI: 0.56-0.65), cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization (HRadj 0.78; 95% CI: 0.74-0.83), CV death (HRadj 0.52; 95% CI: 0.46-0.58), and all-cause mortality (HRadj 0.56; 95% CI: 0.51-0.62), P < 0.001 for each. These associations were qualitatively consistent for both edoxaban and warfarin and across patient subgroups. CONCLUSION: Atrial fibrillation Better Care pathway-concordant care is associated with reductions across multiple CV endpoints and all-cause mortality, with benefit in edoxaban- and warfarin-treated patients and across patient subgroups. Increasing implementation of ABC-concordant care may improve clinical outcomes of patients with AF irrespective of anticoagulant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=20,926). Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway-concordant care vs. Non-ABC-concordant care was evaluated on Stroke or systemic embolic event (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.47-0.63, p=< 0.001). Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway-concordant care was associated with a lower incidence of stroke or systemic embolic events.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: