Key result
The TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention predicted a robust risk gradient for CV death, MI, and ischemic stroke in type 2 diabetes, with 2-year event rates from 0.9% to 19.8% (Ptrend<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) accurately predict cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Cohort (n=16,488)
Does the TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) accurately predict cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 19.8% vs 0.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
The expanded TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) is a well-calibrated tool for predicting cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes.
TRS 2°P stratifies CV risk in T2D; extends its use from prior-MI cohorts to diabetes populations.
OBJECTIVE Improved risk assessment for patients with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk is needed. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) predicts a gradient of risk in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) but has not been evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS CV event rates were compared by baseline TRS 2°P in 16,488 patients enrolled in SAVOR-TIMI 53 (Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus–Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53) with type 2 diabetes and high CV risk or established CV disease. Calibration was tested in the diabetes cohort from the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) Registry. RESULTS TRS 2°P revealed a robust risk gradient for the composite of CV death, MI, and ischemic stroke in the full trial population, with 2-year event rates of 0.9% in the lowest- and 19.8% in the highest-risk groups (Ptrend < 0.001). A clear risk gradient was present within the subgroups of all coronary artery disease (CAD), CAD without prior MI, CAD with prior MI, peripheral artery disease, and prior stroke (Ptrend < 0.001 for each), with consistent risk relationships across subgroups. The C-statistic (0.71 for CV death and 0.66 for the composite end point) was consistent in each subgroup. There was close calibration with the type 2 diabetes cohort from the REACH Registry (goodness-of-fit P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS The expanded TRS 2°P provides a practical and well-calibrated risk prediction tool for patients with type 2 diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergmark et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk or established cardiovascular disease (n=16,488). TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention (TRS 2°P) vs. Lowest-risk group was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke (p=<0.001). The TIMI Risk Score for Secondary Prevention predicted a robust risk gradient for CV death, MI, and ischemic stroke in type 2 diabetes, with 2-year event rates from 0.9% to 19.8% (Ptrend<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: